vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC (ACAD) and Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd (LANV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.0M vs $144.1M, roughly 2.0× Lanvin Group Holdings Ltd).
Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Del Mar, San Diego, California.
Lanvin is a French luxury fashion house founded in 1889 by Jeanne Lanvin in Paris. It is the oldest French fashion house still in operation. Since 2018, it has been a subsidiary of Shanghai-based Lanvin Group. Lanvin Group includes Lanvin, Sergio Rossi, Wolford, St. John Knits, and Caruso.
ACAD vs LANV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.0M | $144.1M |
| Net Profit | $273.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | 90.8% | 53.9% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | -60.5% |
| Net Margin | 96.3% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 90.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.61 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $284.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $278.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.6M | $144.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $244.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $259.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $250.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $242.0M | $184.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $205.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $273.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 90.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 92.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 92.2% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 91.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 91.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 92.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 92.5% | 57.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 88.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | -60.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | -35.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 96.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.61 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $177.7M | $32.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $290.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $-116.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $632.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $177.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $258.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.6M | $32.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $319.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.1M | $19.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $204.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $290.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $136.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $917.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $822.4M | $-116.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $765.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $732.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $577.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $516.7M | $100.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $464.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $632.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $976.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $914.1M | $731.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-48.7M | $-75.1K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.18× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-48.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.0M | $-75.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.0M | $-36.2K | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.93× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.76× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACAD
| Nuplazid | $174.4M | 61% |
| Daybue | $109.6M | 39% |
LANV
Segment breakdown not available.