vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC (ACAD) and TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TIC Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($508.3M vs $284.0M, roughly 1.8× ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC). ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS INC runs the higher net margin — 96.3% vs -9.3%, a 105.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Acadia Pharmaceuticals Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Del Mar, San Diego, California.
ACAD vs TIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.0M | $508.3M |
| Net Profit | $273.6M | $-47.2M |
| Gross Margin | 90.8% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | -3.8% |
| Net Margin | 96.3% | -9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 90.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.61 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $284.0M | $508.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $278.6M | $473.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $264.6M | $313.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $244.3M | $234.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $259.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $250.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $242.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $205.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $273.6M | $-47.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.8M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.7M | $-233.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 90.8% | 35.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 92.2% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 92.2% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 91.7% | 18.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 91.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 92.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 92.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 88.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | -3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.8% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 96.3% | -9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | -11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.61 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.10 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $177.7M | $439.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $177.7M | $439.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $258.0M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.6M | $130.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.7M | $155.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $319.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $177.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $204.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $751.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $752.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $917.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $822.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $765.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $732.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $577.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $516.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $464.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $976.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $914.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-48.7M | $49.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $37.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.18× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $61.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-48.7M | $49.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | $19.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.0M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.3M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $37.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.9M | $10.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.93× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.76× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACAD
| Nuplazid | $174.4M | 61% |
| Daybue | $109.6M | 39% |
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |
