vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AURORA CANNABIS INC (ACB) and IM Cannabis Corp. (IMCC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AURORA CANNABIS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($94.2K vs $10.1K, roughly 9.3× IM Cannabis Corp.). AURORA CANNABIS INC runs the higher net margin — -1.9% vs -7.8%, a 5.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Aurora Cannabis Inc. is a Canadian licensed cannabis producer, headquartered in Edmonton. It trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange and Nasdaq as ACB. As of September 2018, Aurora Cannabis had eight licensed production facilities, five sales licences, and operations in 25 countries. It had a funded capacity of over 625,000 kilograms of cannabis production per annum with the bulk of capacity based in Canada and a growing presence in international markets, particularly Denmark and Latin America. ...
IM Cannabis Corp is a global cannabis enterprise focused on the cultivation, production, distribution and retail of medical and adult-use cannabis products. It runs business across core markets including North America, the European Union and Israel, offering branded cannabis goods, wellness derivatives and related consumer products to medical patients and recreational users.
ACB vs IMCC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $94.2K | $10.1K |
| Net Profit | $-1.7K | $-790 |
| Gross Margin | — | 22.7% |
| Operating Margin | — | -6.9% |
| Net Margin | -1.9% | -7.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $94.2K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | $90.5K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.6K | $9.1K |
| Q4 25 | $-1.7K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-790 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.0% | 23.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -46.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -236.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -19.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -49.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -23.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $2.3K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.2K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 21.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-786.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.4K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.7K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -51.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.3% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
