vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACCESS Newswire Inc. (ACCS) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp (BAH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.6B vs $5.8M, roughly 451.8× ACCESS Newswire Inc.). Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs -9.9%, a 17.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ACCESS Newswire Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.5% vs -10.2%). Over the past eight quarters, ACCESS Newswire Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.0% CAGR vs -2.8%).
PR Newswire is a distributor of press releases headquartered in Chicago. The service was created in 1954 to allow companies to electronically send press releases to news organizations, using teleprinters at first. The founder, Herbert Muschel, operated the service from his house in Manhattan for approximately 15 years. The business was eventually sold to Western Union and then United Newspapers of London. In December 2015, Cision Inc. announced it would acquire the company. On January 1, 2021...
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation is the parent of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., an American company specializing in digital transformation and artificial intelligence. The company is headquartered in McLean, Virginia, in the Washington metropolitan area, with 80 additional offices around the globe. Booz Allen's stated core business is to provide consulting, analysis, and engineering services to public- and private-sector organizations and nonprofits.
ACCS vs BAH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.8M | $2.6B |
| Net Profit | $-576.0K | $200.0M |
| Gross Margin | 77.4% | 51.9% |
| Operating Margin | -13.1% | 8.8% |
| Net Margin | -9.9% | 7.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.5% | -10.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 94.4% | 7.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.16 | $1.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.8M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $-576.0K | $200.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-45.0K | $175.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-475.0K | $271.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.4M | $192.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.2M | $186.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-466.0K | $390.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0K | $165.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-139.0K | $128.0M |
| Q4 25 | 77.4% | 51.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.6% | 53.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.2% | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 78.0% | 53.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 75.2% | 55.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.0% | 56.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.2% | 53.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 75.1% | 54.7% |
| Q4 25 | -13.1% | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.2% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.4% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -245.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.7% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.5% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | -9.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.5% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 98.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -175.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.3% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.16 | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $1.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | $2.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.40 | $1.52 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.66 | $1.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.12 | $3.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | $1.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | $0.97 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $882.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $30.3M | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $42.0M | $7.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.84× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $882.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $816.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $711.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $885.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $453.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $558.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $297.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $554.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.4B |
| Q4 25 | $30.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.8M | $996.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.2M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $42.0M | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.0M | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.6M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.3M | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.6M | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.7M | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.8M | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.4M | $6.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.26× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $258.0K | $261.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $248.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 9.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.30× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $933.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $258.0K | $261.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-582.0K | $421.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.0K | $119.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $747.0K | $219.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $866.0K | $150.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $587.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-190.0K | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $986.0K | $143.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $248.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-590.0K | $395.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $735.0K | $194.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $133.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $563.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $970.0K | $127.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.3% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.4% | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.14× | 1.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.14× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACCS
| Cost To Deliver Products | $3.1M | 54% |
| Employee Costs | $1.7M | 29% |
| Other | $1.0M | 17% |
BAH
| Defense Clients | $1.5B | 55% |
| Civil Clients | $732.0M | 28% |
| Intelligence Clients | $434.0M | 17% |
