vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN COASTAL INSURANCE Corp (ACIC) and AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $86.4M, roughly 1.2× AMERICAN COASTAL INSURANCE Corp). AMERICAN COASTAL INSURANCE Corp runs the higher net margin — 30.8% vs -55.2%, a 86.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 9.0%). AMERICAN COASTAL INSURANCE Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($70.9M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, AMERICAN COASTAL INSURANCE Corp's revenue compounded faster (13.9% CAGR vs -2.6%).
United Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Inc. is an American property and casualty insurance company with headquarters in Florida. It writes commercial, residential, homeowners’, and flood insurance policies in several coastal states.
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
ACIC vs AP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.4M | $104.4M |
| Net Profit | $26.6M | $-57.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 43.2% | -54.0% |
| Net Margin | 30.8% | -55.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.0% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 437.1% | -1958.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.54 | $-2.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $86.4M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.4M | $103.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.5M | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.2M | $99.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.3M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $82.1M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.7M | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.6M | $110.0M |
| Q4 25 | $26.6M | $-57.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.5M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.4M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.1M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.6M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | 43.2% | -54.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.8% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.9% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 30.8% | -55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.9% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.2% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.4% | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.54 | $-2.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.65 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.43 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.10 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.39 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.48 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $198.8M | $10.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $150.0M | $117.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $317.6M | $32.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $495.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.47× | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $198.8M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $267.9M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.5M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $167.2M | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.0M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $183.1M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $229.4M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $285.4M | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | $150.0M | $117.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $115.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.0M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $116.2M |
| Q4 25 | $317.6M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $327.2M | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $292.3M | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.9M | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $235.7M | $58.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $259.6M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.1M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $204.0M | $56.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $495.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $524.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $537.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $536.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $530.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $547.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $565.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.47× | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.64× | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $71.0M | $2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $70.9M | $-64.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 82.0% | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.67× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-8.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $71.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-35.6M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.9M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.4M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $243.5M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.5M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | $70.9M | $-64.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $243.5M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | 82.0% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.5% | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 307.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.9% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.67× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.84× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | -4.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.23× | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.63× | -2.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.27× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACIC
Segment breakdown not available.
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
