vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AC Immune SA (ACIU) and Becton Dickinson (BDX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Becton Dickinson is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.3B vs $1.4M, roughly 3655.9× AC Immune SA). Becton Dickinson runs the higher net margin — 7.3% vs -1622.4%, a 1629.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AC Immune SA posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (90.1% vs -0.4%).
AC Immune SA is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing innovative therapeutics and diagnostic solutions for neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and rare tauopathies. It operates globally, partners with leading pharmaceutical enterprises, and prioritizes addressing unmet medical needs in neurological care segments.
Becton, Dickinson and Company is an American multinational medical technology company that manufactures and sells medical devices, instrument systems, and reagents. BD also provides consulting and analytics services in certain areas.
ACIU vs BDX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4M | $5.3B |
| Net Profit | $-23.3M | $382.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 45.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1484.5% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | -1622.4% | 7.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 90.1% | -0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.9% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4M | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $755.7K | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | $382.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $493.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-23.3M | $574.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $308.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $303.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $400.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.0M | $487.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $537.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 45.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 42.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 46.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1484.5% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3051.1% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1622.4% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3313.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.71 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.85 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.3M | $740.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $82.2M | $25.3B |
| Total Assets | $209.2M | $54.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $740.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $641.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.3M | $735.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $667.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $711.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.7M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $25.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.2M | $25.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $25.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $25.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.8M | $25.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $54.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $55.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $209.2M | $54.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $54.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $54.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $57.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.3M | $55.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $54.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $657.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $549.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 10.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.72× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $2.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $657.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $164.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $693.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $514.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $549.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $35.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $588.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $882.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $380.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.66× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.96× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACIU
Segment breakdown not available.
BDX
| Other | $2.8B | 53% |
| Medication Management Solutions | $678.0M | 13% |
| Urologyand Critical Care | $339.0M | 6% |
| Surgery | $310.0M | 6% |
| Peripheral Intervention | $265.0M | 5% |
| Specimen Management | $245.0M | 5% |
| Advanced Patient Monitoring | $178.0M | 3% |
| Diagnostic Solutions | $176.0M | 3% |
| Bio Pharma Systems | $150.0M | 3% |
| Biosciences | $124.0M | 2% |
