vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX) and UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES (UBFO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.5M vs $8.1M, roughly 1.7× Arcellx, Inc.). UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs -766.0%, a 791.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.6% vs -79.3%). UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES produced more free cash flow last quarter ($19.8M vs $-63.9M). Over the past eight quarters, UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES's revenue compounded faster (3.0% CAGR vs -24.6%).
Arcellx, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company that develops innovative chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies for treating hard-to-treat cancers including hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Its core pipeline targets unmet oncology medical needs, serving global patient populations and partnering with life sciences stakeholders.
United Security Bancshares is a bank holding company headquartered in Fresno, California. It operates 11 branches.
ACLX vs UBFO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.1M | $13.5M |
| Net Profit | $-62.3M | $3.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -847.6% | 31.5% |
| Net Margin | -766.0% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -79.3% | 13.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -765.1% | 36.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.13 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.3M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.4M | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.3M | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-62.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-47.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.9M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-27.2M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.2M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -847.6% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -348.2% | 27.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -129.1% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -127.8% | 46.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -40.3% | 45.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -766.0% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -308.4% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -99.4% | 27.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -99.3% | 33.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.3% | 32.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.13 | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.87 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.48 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.51 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $543.3M | $264.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $416.9M | $139.7M |
| Total Assets | $648.1M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $199.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $543.3M | $198.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $587.4M | $216.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $574.3M | $216.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $516.7M | $166.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $573.9M | $168.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $139.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $137.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $134.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.9M | $132.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $454.8M | $130.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $483.0M | $132.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $487.2M | $127.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $496.6M | $124.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $648.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $711.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $764.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $734.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $779.7M | $1.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-63.1M | $22.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-63.9M | $19.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -786.4% | 146.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.6% | 16.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-122.5M | $36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-63.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.7M | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-31.9M | $7.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-63.9M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-47.5M | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-39.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-38.3M | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 146.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 64.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -786.4% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -311.3% | 156.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 109.2% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -144.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -97.7% | 54.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.4% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
