vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AECOM (ACM) and Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Canadian Solar Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.5B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.2× AECOM). AECOM runs the higher net margin — 1.9% vs 1.3%, a 0.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
AECOM is an American multinational infrastructure consulting firm headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Canadian Solar Inc. is a global renewable energy company. Headquartered in Kitchener, Ontario, the company manufactures solar PV modules, provides battery energy storage solutions and develops utility-scale solar power and battery energy storage projects.
ACM vs CSIQ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $4.5B |
| Net Profit | $74.5M | $57.6M |
| Gross Margin | 7.3% | 17.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 2.2% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $74.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.4M | $57.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $63.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.4M | $36.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $172.5M | $366.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.3M | $304.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 18.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.90 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.27 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $1.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $3.9B |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $13.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.18× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $13.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.8B | $13.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | $11.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.96× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $70.2M | $-187.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.94× | -3.26× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $616.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $70.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.1M | $-187.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $274.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $73.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | -3.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 93.70× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
