vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AECOM (ACM) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AECOM is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.8× Roper Technologies). Roper Technologies runs the higher net margin — 15.8% vs 1.9%, a 13.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Roper Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.3% vs 1.6%). Roper Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($507.0M vs $41.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Roper Technologies's revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs -1.4%).
AECOM is an American multinational infrastructure consulting firm headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
ACM vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $74.5M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | 7.3% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.0% | 842.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $74.5M | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.4M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.4M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.0M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $172.5M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.3M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | 5.8% | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.56 | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.90 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.08 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.25 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.27 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.98 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.18× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.8B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | 1.18× | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.11× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $70.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.9M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.1% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.94× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $616.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $70.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.1M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.7M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.7M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.1M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.8M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.3M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | $41.9M | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $274.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.1% | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.17× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.90× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.17× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
