vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AECOM (ACM) and KeyCorp (KEY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AECOM is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.9× KeyCorp). KeyCorp runs the higher net margin — 25.4% vs 1.9%, a 23.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KeyCorp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (131.8% vs 1.6%). KeyCorp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.1B vs $41.9M). Over the past eight quarters, KeyCorp's revenue compounded faster (14.4% CAGR vs -1.4%).
AECOM is an American multinational infrastructure consulting firm headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Key is a Japanese visual novel studio known for making dramatic and plot-oriented titles. It was formed on July 21, 1998, as a brand under the publisher Visual Arts, and is located in Kita, Osaka.
ACM vs KEY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $2.0B |
| Net Profit | $74.5M | $510.0M |
| Gross Margin | 7.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 32.3% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 25.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 131.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.0% | 309.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.43 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $865.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $695.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $74.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $510.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.4M | $489.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $425.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.4M | $405.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.0M | $-244.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $172.5M | $-410.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.3M | $274.0M |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | 31.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 29.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | -92.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | -72.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 22.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 22.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | -54.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | -59.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.90 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.08 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.25 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.27 | $-0.47 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.98 | $0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $10.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | $9.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $20.4B |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $184.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.18× | 0.49× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $11.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $15.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $17.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $22.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $15.5B |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $10.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $12.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $12.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $12.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $15.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $16.9B |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $20.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $19.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $19.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $18.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $16.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $14.8B |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $184.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $187.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $185.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.8B | $188.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $187.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1B | $189.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | $187.4B |
| Q1 26 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.06× | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.99× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | 0.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.11× | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | 0.93× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 1.14× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $70.2M | $2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.9M | $2.1B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.1% | 104.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 5.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.94× | 4.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $616.0M | $3.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $70.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.1M | $396.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.7M | $-140.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.1M | $664.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.8M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.3M | $-217.0M |
| Q1 26 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.1M | $367.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $-150.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.9M | $599.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $274.5M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.8M | $-230.0M |
| Q1 26 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 104.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 65.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | -8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | -175.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | -15.1% |
| Q1 26 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 0.9% |
| Q1 26 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.17× | 2.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | -0.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.17× | -0.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
