vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AECOM (ACM) and QVC INC (QVCD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AECOM is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.4B, roughly 1.6× QVC INC). AECOM runs the higher net margin — 1.9% vs 1.5%, a 0.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AECOM posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.6% vs -8.9%). Over the past eight quarters, QVC INC's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs -1.4%).
AECOM is an American multinational infrastructure consulting firm headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
QVC Group, is an American media conglomerate controlled by company chairman John C. Malone, who owns a majority of the voting shares.
ACM vs QVCD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $2.4B |
| Net Profit | $74.5M | $37.0M |
| Gross Margin | 7.3% | 32.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 5.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | -8.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.0% | 103.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $74.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.4M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.4M | $-42.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.0M | $-1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $172.5M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.3M | $53.0M |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 32.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 33.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | 32.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 34.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | -114.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | -47.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | -109.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | -46.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 2.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.90 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.08 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.27 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.98 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | $1.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $8.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.18× | 0.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $297.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $297.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $315.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $3.7B |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $4.3B |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.8B | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $9.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | $11.2B |
| Q1 26 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.06× | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.99× | 3.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | 1.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.11× | 1.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 0.87× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $70.2M | $245.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.94× | 6.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $616.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $70.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $245.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.1M | $76.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.7M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.7M | $46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.1M | $189.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.8M | $98.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.3M | $164.0M |
| Q1 26 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $274.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 38.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | 1.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.17× | 3.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACM
Segment breakdown not available.
QVCD
| Home | $754.0M | 31% |
| QVC International | $661.0M | 27% |
| Beauty | $260.0M | 11% |
| Apparel | $254.0M | 10% |
| Electronics | $187.0M | 8% |
| Accessories | $181.0M | 7% |
| Jewelry | $87.0M | 4% |
| Otherrevenue | $38.0M | 2% |
