vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Autodesk (ADSK) and Roper Technologies (ROP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roper Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.1B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.1× Autodesk). Autodesk runs the higher net margin — 16.1% vs 15.8%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Autodesk posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.4% vs 11.3%). Autodesk produced more free cash flow last quarter ($972.0M vs $507.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Autodesk's revenue compounded faster (17.5% CAGR vs 10.5%).
Autodesk, Inc. is an American multinational software corporation that provides software products and services for the architecture, engineering, construction, manufacturing, media, education, and entertainment industries. Autodesk is headquartered in San Francisco, California, and has offices worldwide. Its U.S. offices are located in the states of California, Oregon, Colorado, Texas, Michigan, New Hampshire and Massachusetts.
Roper Technologies, Inc. is a holding company that owns companies in the technology sector.
ADSK vs ROP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $316.0M | $331.0M |
| Gross Margin | 91.5% | 69.4% |
| Operating Margin | 22.0% | 27.2% |
| Net Margin | 16.1% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 19.4% | 11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.3% | 842.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.47 | $4.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $316.0M | $331.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $343.0M | $428.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $313.0M | $398.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.0M | $378.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $303.0M | $331.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.0M | $462.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $367.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $252.0M | $337.1M |
| Q1 26 | 91.5% | 69.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 91.1% | 69.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 91.0% | 69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 90.2% | 69.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 90.6% | 68.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.6% | 68.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.7% | 69.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.3% | 69.5% |
| Q1 26 | 22.0% | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.4% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.2% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 28.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.3% | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | 16.1% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.8% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.5% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | $1.47 | $4.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.60 | $3.97 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.46 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.70 | $3.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.39 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.27 | $4.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.30 | $3.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.16 | $3.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.6B | $382.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.0B | $18.8B |
| Total Assets | $12.5B | $34.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.82× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | $382.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $297.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $320.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $242.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $372.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $188.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $269.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $251.5M |
| Q1 26 | $2.5B | $9.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $9.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | $18.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $20.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $19.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $18.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | $12.5B | $34.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.2B | $34.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9B | $34.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.6B | $33.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.8B | $31.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.1B | $31.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0B | $31.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8B | $29.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.82× | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.86× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.92× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.88× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $989.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $972.0M | $507.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 49.7% | 24.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.13× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.4B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $989.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $439.0M | $738.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $460.0M | $869.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $564.0M | $404.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $692.0M | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $209.0M | $722.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $212.0M | $755.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $494.0M | $384.1M |
| Q1 26 | $972.0M | $507.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $430.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $451.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $678.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $203.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $487.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | 49.7% | 24.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.13× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.28× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.47× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.71× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.28× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.76× | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.75× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.96× | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ADSK
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $602.0M | 31% |
| Auto CA Dand Auto CADLT Family | $478.0M | 24% |
| Manufacturing | $381.0M | 19% |
| Make | $218.0M | 11% |
| Other | $130.0M | 7% |
| Other Research And Development | $129.0M | 7% |
| Maintenance | $8.0M | 0% |
ROP
Segment breakdown not available.
