vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AECOM (ACM) and Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AECOM is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.7B, roughly 1.4× Molson Coors Beverage Company). Molson Coors Beverage Company runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs 1.9%, a 3.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Molson Coors Beverage Company posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.0% vs 1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, AECOM's revenue compounded faster (-1.4% CAGR vs -15.8%).
AECOM is an American multinational infrastructure consulting firm headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is a Canadian-American multinational drink and brewing company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois and Montreal, Quebec.
ACM vs TAP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $74.5M | $150.1M |
| Gross Margin | 7.3% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.0% | 25.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $74.5M | $150.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $238.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.4M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $428.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.4M | $121.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.0M | $287.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $172.5M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.3M | $427.0M |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 34.6% |
| Q1 26 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | -98.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | -84.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.56 | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.90 | $-14.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.08 | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.25 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.27 | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.98 | $2.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $382.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | $3.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $10.3B |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $22.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.18× | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | $382.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $896.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $950.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $613.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $412.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $969.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $7.0B |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $13.2B |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | $22.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $22.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $22.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $26.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.8B | $25.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $26.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1B | $26.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | $27.4B |
| Q1 26 | 1.18× | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.06× | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.99× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.11× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $70.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.94× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $616.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $70.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $540.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.1M | $616.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.7M | $718.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.7M | $-90.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.1M | $494.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.8M | $521.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.3M | $869.2M |
| Q1 26 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.1M | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.7M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $-328.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.9M | $383.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $274.5M | $350.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.8M | $691.7M |
| Q1 26 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | -12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.17× | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | -0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.90× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.17× | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
