vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AECOM (ACM) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vistra Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.3× AECOM). Vistra Corp. runs the higher net margin — 4.8% vs 1.9%, a 2.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vistra Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 1.6%). Vistra Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($596.0M vs $41.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Vistra Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (23.3% CAGR vs -1.4%).
AECOM is an American multinational infrastructure consulting firm headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Vistra may refer to either of two companies:Vistra, a corporate services company based in Hong Kong Vistra Corp, an energy company based in Texas
ACM vs VST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $4.8B |
| Net Profit | $74.5M | $233.0M |
| Gross Margin | 7.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 9.9% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 31.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.0% | -47.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | $74.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $233.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.4M | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $327.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.4M | $-268.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.0M | $441.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $172.5M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.3M | $365.0M |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | -2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 59.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 22.5% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | -6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 10.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.90 | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.08 | $-0.93 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.25 | $1.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.27 | $5.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.98 | $0.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $785.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | $15.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $5.1B |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $41.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.18× | 3.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $785.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $602.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $458.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $561.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $905.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $15.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $15.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $15.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $13.9B |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $5.6B |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $41.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $38.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $38.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.8B | $38.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $37.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1B | $37.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | $39.1B |
| Q1 26 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.06× | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.99× | 3.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | 3.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.11× | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | 2.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | 2.49× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $70.2M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.9M | $596.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.1% | 12.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 17.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.94× | 6.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $616.0M | $1.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $70.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.7M | $572.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.7M | $599.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.3M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $596.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.7M | $-118.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $-169.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.9M | $923.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $274.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.8M | $698.0M |
| Q1 26 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 19.4% |
| Q1 26 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 13.8% |
| Q1 26 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 2.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.17× | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.90× | 3.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.17× | 3.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACM
Segment breakdown not available.
VST
| Retail Energy Charge In ERCOT | $2.1B | 43% |
| Retail Energy Charge In Northeast Midwest | $1.2B | 24% |
| East Segment | $1.1B | 24% |
| Hedging Revenue Realized | $170.0M | 4% |
| Revenue From Other Wholesale Contracts | $116.0M | 2% |
| Transferable Production Tax Credit Revenues | $78.0M | 2% |
| West Segment | $77.0M | 2% |
| Intersegment Sales | $25.0M | 1% |
