vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AECOM (ACM) and WHIRLPOOL CORP (WHR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WHIRLPOOL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.1B vs $3.8B, roughly 1.1× AECOM). WHIRLPOOL CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.7% vs 1.9%, a 0.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AECOM posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.6% vs -0.9%). WHIRLPOOL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($989.0M vs $41.9M). Over the past eight quarters, AECOM's revenue compounded faster (-1.4% CAGR vs -4.5%).
AECOM is an American multinational infrastructure consulting firm headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Whirlpool Corporation is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of home appliances headquartered in Benton Charter Township, Michigan, United States. In 2023, the Fortune 500 company had an annual revenue of approximately $19 billion in sales, around 59,000 employees, and more than 55 manufacturing and technology research centers globally.
ACM vs WHR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $4.1B |
| Net Profit | $74.5M | $109.0M |
| Gross Margin | 7.3% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 6.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 2.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | -0.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.0% | 127.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $1.92 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $74.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.4M | $73.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.0M | $65.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.4M | $71.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.0M | $-392.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $172.5M | $109.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $134.3M | $219.0M |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.9% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.8% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.2% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 15.7% |
| Q1 26 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.8% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | -9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 5.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.92 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.90 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | $1.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.08 | $1.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.25 | $-7.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.27 | $2.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.98 | $3.96 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2B | $669.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.6B | $6.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $11.9B | $16.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.18× | 2.26× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $669.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $934.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $16.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.8B | $16.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $16.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.1B | $17.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | $17.3B |
| Q1 26 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.26× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.11× | 2.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $70.2M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $41.9M | $989.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.1% | 24.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.94× | 10.45× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $616.0M | $81.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $70.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $196.1M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.7M | $19.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $190.7M | $-721.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.8M | $214.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.3M | $388.0M |
| Q1 26 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $989.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.1M | $-52.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $261.7M | $-63.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $178.3M | $-793.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.9M | $970.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $274.5M | $127.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.8M | $275.0M |
| Q1 26 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | -21.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.45× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.17× | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.33× | -10.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | 1.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.17× | 1.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACM
Segment breakdown not available.
WHR
| Refrigeration | $1.2B | 30% |
| Laundry | $1.1B | 27% |
| Cooking | $1.1B | 26% |
| Dishwashing | $299.0M | 7% |
| Other | $266.0M | 6% |
| Spare Parts And Warranties | $139.0M | 3% |
