vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) and WORLD ACCEPTANCE CORP (WRLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ACM Research, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($231.3M vs $141.3M, roughly 1.6× WORLD ACCEPTANCE CORP). ACM Research, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs -0.6%, a 8.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ACM Research, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (34.2% vs 1.9%). Over the past eight quarters, ACM Research, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs -5.8%).
ACM Research, Inc. is a leading global supplier of advanced processing equipment for the semiconductor manufacturing industry. It designs, develops and commercializes high-performance wet processing systems including wafer cleaning, electroplating and etching tools, which support production of advanced logic, memory and power semiconductor chips, serving chip manufacturers across Asia, North America and Europe.
Credit Acceptance Corporation is an auto finance company providing automobile loans and other related financial products. The company operates its financial program through a national network of dealer-partners, the automobile dealers participating in the programs. The company operates two programs: the "Portfolio Program" and the "Purchase Program". Through these programs, the company can advance money to automobile dealers in exchange for the right to service the underlying consumer loans a...
ACMR vs WRLD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $231.3M | $141.3M |
| Net Profit | $17.3M | $-911.3K |
| Gross Margin | 46.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.6% | -0.7% |
| Net Margin | 7.5% | -0.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 34.2% | 1.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.7% | -106.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $-0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $231.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $244.4M | $141.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $269.2M | $134.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.4M | $132.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.3M | $165.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $223.5M | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $204.0M | $131.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $202.5M | $129.5M |
| Q1 26 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.0M | $-911.3K | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.9M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.8M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | $44.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.1M | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.9M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.2M | $9.9M |
| Q1 26 | 46.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 49.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.4% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.7% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.6% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.3% | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | 26.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.52 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.44 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $8.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.47 | $2.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.45 | $3.99 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.35 | $1.79 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $872.3M | $10.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $314.8M | $677.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $351.6M |
| Total Assets | $3.1B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.15× | 1.93× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $872.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $792.9M | $10.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $463.2M | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.6M | $4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $426.8M | $10.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.8M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $343.6M | $11.1M |
| Q1 26 | $314.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $214.0M | $677.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.0M | $584.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $225.1M | $472.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $202.5M | $447.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.0M | $561.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.0M | $506.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.5M | $494.7M |
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $351.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $365.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $986.5M | $427.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $949.1M | $439.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $904.6M | $428.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $888.2M | $417.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $833.2M | $422.6M |
| Q1 26 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.15× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.21× | 1.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.17× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.17× | 1.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.11× | 1.17× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $58.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $57.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 40.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $412.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $33.9M | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.6M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-44.9M | $58.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3M | $254.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.6M | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9M | $53.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.6M | $48.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.1M | $57.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.6M | $47.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-59.6M | $57.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.4M | $250.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.2M | $60.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.6M | $52.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.5M | $47.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 40.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.8% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -27.7% | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.6% | 151.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.5% | 43.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.1% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | 36.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.1% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.13× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.51× | 43.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.26× | 5.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.85× | 4.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.39× | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.54× | 4.87× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
