vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACNB CORP (ACNB) and KAMADA LTD (KMDA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ACNB CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($47.2M vs $47.0M, roughly 1.0× KAMADA LTD). ACNB CORP runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs 11.3%, a 11.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ACNB CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (42.2% vs 12.6%). Over the past eight quarters, ACNB CORP's revenue compounded faster (22.1% CAGR vs 12.0%).
ACNB Corp is a US-based financial holding company headquartered in Pennsylvania. It provides a full suite of financial solutions including retail and commercial banking, wealth management, trust services, and property & casualty insurance products. Its core market covers local communities, individual consumers, and small-to-medium enterprises across south-central Pennsylvania and northern Maryland.
Kamada Ltd. is a global biopharmaceutical company specializing in the research, manufacturing, and commercialization of specialty pharmaceuticals derived from human plasma.
ACNB vs KMDA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $47.2M | $47.0M |
| Net Profit | $10.8M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 42.0% |
| Operating Margin | 27.9% | 16.6% |
| Net Margin | 22.9% | 11.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 42.2% | 12.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 63.8% | 37.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.10 | $0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $47.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.9M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.3M | $44.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.5M | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.1M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.3M | $42.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.6M | $37.7M |
| Q4 25 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.6M | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-272.0K | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.8M | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 44.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.4% |
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.2% | 16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.7% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 17.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.9% | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.2% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.4% | 6.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.42 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.11 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.84 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.32 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.80 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $65.6M | $72.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $255.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $420.0M | $265.2M |
| Total Assets | $3.2B | $377.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $65.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.1M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.1M | $66.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.6M | $76.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.1M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.3M | $56.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.1M | $48.2M |
| Q4 25 | $255.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $255.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $255.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $255.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $420.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.6M | $265.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $395.2M | $260.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $386.9M | $252.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $303.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $306.8M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $289.3M | $251.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $279.9M | $251.2M |
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $377.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $368.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $375.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $351.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $351.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $343.2M |
| Q4 25 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.91× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $53.6M | $10.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $52.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 111.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.96× | 1.97× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $92.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $53.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.2M | $10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.8M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-71.0K | $-513.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.6M | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.7M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $1.0M |
| Q4 25 | $52.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-730.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 111.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 117.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.96× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.56× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.52× | 1.09× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.03× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.88× | 5.75× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.86× | 3.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.60× | 0.43× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
