vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aclarion, Inc. (ACON) and Silo Pharma, Inc. (SILO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aclarion, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.5K vs $18.0K, roughly 1.0× Silo Pharma, Inc.). Silo Pharma, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -6160.5% vs -10223.7%, a 4063.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Aclarion, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (80.6% vs 0.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Aclarion, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (35.2% CAGR vs 0.0%).
Aclarion, Inc. is a medical technology company focused on developing non-invasive solutions for chronic lower back pain diagnosis and treatment. Its core offerings leverage proprietary magnetic resonance spectroscopy technology to accurately identify painful intervertebral discs, serving healthcare providers and patients across the United States, with key focus on the chronic pain management and spinal care segments.
The Pharma Documentation Ring (P-D-R), founded in 1958, is a think tank of information and knowledge-management professionals representing major research-based pharmaceutical companies. The association has four aims:Promote exchange of knowledge among members Encourage commercial development of new information services and systems Jointly assess new and existing products and services Provide a forum for the information industry
ACON vs SILO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $18.5K | $18.0K |
| Net Profit | $-1.9M | $-1.1M |
| Gross Margin | 9.7% | -14.8% |
| Operating Margin | -10785.8% | -6388.2% |
| Net Margin | -10223.7% | -6160.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 80.6% | 0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.0% | -19.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.39 | $-0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $18.5K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.9K | $18.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.3K | $18.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0K | $18.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.4K | $18.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0K | $18.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1K | $18.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.6M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.0M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.4M | $-928.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2M | $-931.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.4M | $-801.7K |
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.2% | -14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.6% | 91.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -23.6% | 91.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -100.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -48.1% | 91.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -112.3% | 91.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -92.6% | 91.9% |
| Q4 25 | -10785.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9666.2% | -6388.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8988.6% | -6926.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7856.0% | -6069.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17652.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -8995.3% | -5603.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10350.6% | -5563.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12609.3% | -4879.1% |
| Q4 25 | -10223.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9008.0% | -6160.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8285.9% | -6681.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10728.4% | -5721.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -19444.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -9482.7% | -5152.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11285.0% | -5169.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -23720.6% | -4447.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.39 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.93 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.75 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.32 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-809.36 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1321.49 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1362.83 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3985.22 | $-0.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $12.0M | $5.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.8M | $5.0M |
| Total Assets | $13.7M | $6.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.8M | $6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.8M | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $453.7K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5M | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2M | $4.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.8M | $4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $970.1K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | $13.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.2M | $6.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7M | $6.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.6M | $-955.5K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | $-955.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.5M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-922.9K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.1M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $-731.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.2M | $-838.2K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6164.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
