vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACACIA RESEARCH CORP (ACTG) and NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP (NRP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.3M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.0× ACACIA RESEARCH CORP). NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP runs the higher net margin — 78.5% vs 6.8%, a 71.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ACACIA RESEARCH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -21.8%). Over the past eight quarters, ACACIA RESEARCH CORP's revenue compounded faster (43.6% CAGR vs -8.3%).
Acacia Research Corporation is a publicly traded American company based in New York City. It acquires and operates businesses in industries including the technology, energy, and industrial/manufacturing sectors. Acacia has a strategic relationship with Starboard Value, LP, the company's controlling shareholder. The company has been characterized as a patent troll.
Natural Resource Partners LP is a U.S.-headquartered master limited partnership that owns, manages and leases mineral reserve interests. Its asset portfolio covers coal, aggregates, industrial minerals and oil & gas, with operations primarily across North America, deriving most revenue from royalties paid by third-party resource extraction operators.
ACTG vs NRP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.1M | $51.3M |
| Net Profit | $3.4M | $40.3M |
| Gross Margin | 12.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | 83.7% |
| Net Margin | 6.8% | 78.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | -21.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 125.5% | -28.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $50.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.4M | $51.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $48.8M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3M | $50.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.8M | $54.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.3M | $65.6M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.3M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.4M | $42.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.0M | $38.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.4M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-186.0K | $56.2M |
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.8% | 83.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -32.4% | 74.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -44.1% | 84.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.4% | 92.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.6% | 91.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | 78.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -27.5% | 69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -60.0% | 76.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -32.7% | 84.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.8% | 85.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $306.7M | $30.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $91.9M | $138.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $543.5M | — |
| Total Assets | $771.0M | $772.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $306.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $272.0M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $273.9M | $30.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $410.9M | $30.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $441.9M | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $498.4M | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | $91.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $138.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $142.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $210.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $188.8M |
| Q4 25 | $543.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $537.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $538.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $540.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $514.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $540.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $568.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $771.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $768.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $775.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $801.6M | $772.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $756.4M | $772.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $707.6M | $772.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $753.6M | $789.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $631.7M | $772.9M |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $75.2M | $34.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 22.01× | 0.86× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $75.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.1M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-593.0K | $54.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1M | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.8M | $71.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $335.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-126.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -201.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -490.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 224.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 304.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 553.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 22.01× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.10× | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACTG
| Energy Operations | $16.0M | 32% |
| Transportation Safety | $10.4M | 21% |
| Office Storage And Display Solutions | $8.4M | 17% |
| Printers Consumables And Parts | $6.5M | 13% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $5.1M | 10% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $3.3M | 7% |
NRP
| Coal Royalty Revenues | $35.5M | 69% |
| Soda Ash Segment | $4.6M | 9% |
| Transportation And Processing Services | $4.4M | 9% |
| Production Lease Minimum Revenues | $2.7M | 5% |
| Oil And Gas Royalty Revenues | $2.4M | 5% |
| Other | $1.6M | 3% |
