vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACME UNITED CORP (ACU) and HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.1M vs $52.3M, roughly 1.8× ACME UNITED CORP). ACME UNITED CORP runs the higher net margin — 1.9% vs -98.1%, a 100.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (218.6% vs 13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (102.2% CAGR vs -2.9%).
Acme United Corporation is a supplier of cutting, measuring and safety products for the school, home, office, hardware and industrial markets. The company was organized as a partnership in 1867 and incorporated in 1873 under the laws of the State of Connecticut. It is publicly traded on the NYSE American with symbol ACU.
Mastech Digital, Inc. is a digital transformation and information technology (IT) services company headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, providing services to corporations across North America, Middle East, Asian, and Japan.
ACU vs HIVE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $52.3M | $93.1M |
| Net Profit | $985.0K | $-91.3M |
| Gross Margin | 39.7% | -27.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | -98.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 218.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -40.4% | -234.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $-0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $93.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.1M | $87.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.0M | $45.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.9M | $29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.2M | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.4M | $32.2M |
| Q1 26 | $985.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $-91.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $80.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $-18.3M |
| Q1 26 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.0% | -13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | -43.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.5% | -66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | -7.4% |
| Q1 26 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | -98.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | -18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 76.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 233.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | -56.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.46 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.16 | $0.18 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.43 | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.09 | $-0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $33.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $116.7M | $559.3M |
| Total Assets | $195.2M | $624.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.28× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4M | $40.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | $31.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $116.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.6M | $559.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.8M | $624.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.7M | $560.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.0M | $430.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.3M | $275.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.0M | $268.6M |
| Q1 26 | $195.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $171.0M | $624.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $173.0M | $693.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.9M | $628.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $163.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.2M | $478.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $334.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $46.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4M | $-28.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9M | $-4.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | $-55.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $-34.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | -189.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | -153.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 92.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 143.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.34× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.33× | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.02× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.73× | -0.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.99× | -26.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.55× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
