vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Adobe Inc. (ADBE) and Xiao-I Corp (AIXI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Adobe Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.4B vs $11.5M, roughly 555.5× Xiao-I Corp). Adobe Inc. runs the higher net margin — 29.5% vs -263.9%, a 293.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Adobe Inc., formerly Adobe Systems Incorporated, is an American multinational computer software company based in San Jose, California. It offers a wide range of programs from web design tools, photo manipulation, and vector creation to video and audio editing, mobile app development, print layout, and animation software.
Xiao-i is a Chinese cognitive artificial intelligence enterprise founded in 2001.
ADBE vs AIXI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4B | $11.5M |
| Net Profit | $1.9B | $-30.4M |
| Gross Margin | 89.6% | 58.1% |
| Operating Margin | 37.8% | -254.9% |
| Net Margin | 29.5% | -263.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 4.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.60 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0B | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $33.0M |
| Q1 26 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $-30.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $-30.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $-15.5M |
| Q1 26 | 89.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 89.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 89.3% | 58.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 89.1% | 58.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 89.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 89.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 89.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 88.7% | 64.5% |
| Q1 26 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | -254.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.9% | -254.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.5% | -45.0% |
| Q1 26 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.6% | -263.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | -263.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.6% | -47.2% |
| Q1 26 | $4.60 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.44 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.18 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.94 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.14 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.75 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.76 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.49 | $-0.64 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.9B | $5.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.4B | — |
| Total Assets | $29.7B | $82.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.47× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9B | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.1B | $1.8M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | $29.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8B | $82.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1B | $82.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.0B | $87.6M |
| Q1 26 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.28× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.0B | $-2.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.9B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 45.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.57× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $10.3B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | 45.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 50.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.24× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.23× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ADBE
| Subscription Revenue | $6.2B | 97% |
| Service Other | $110.0M | 2% |
| Products | $90.0M | 1% |
AIXI
Segment breakdown not available.
