vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Xiao-I Corp (AIXI) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $11.5M, roughly 107.7× Xiao-I Corp). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs -263.9%, a 279.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Xiao-i is a Chinese cognitive artificial intelligence enterprise founded in 2001.
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
AIXI vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.5M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-30.4M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | 58.1% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | -254.9% | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | -263.9% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.0M | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-30.4M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.5M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.1% | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 58.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 64.5% | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -254.9% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -254.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -45.0% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -263.9% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -263.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -47.2% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.64 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $82.4M | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.4M | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.6M | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIXI
Segment breakdown not available.
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
