vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AGREE REALTY CORP (ADC) and Danaos Corp (DAC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Danaos Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($262.2M vs $200.8M, roughly 1.3× AGREE REALTY CORP). Danaos Corp runs the higher net margin — 49.9% vs 31.0%, a 18.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AGREE REALTY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs 6.4%).
Duke Realty was a real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Indianapolis, Indiana, that invested in industrial properties. As of December 31, 2021, it owned or jointly controlled 548 primarily industrial properties containing 162.7 million rentable square feet. In October 2022, it was acquired by Prologis.
Danaos Corporation is a leading global containership ownership and management firm. It operates a large fleet of modern container vessels, providing long-term charter services to top international container liner operators across major global trade routes, supporting the efficiency and reliability of global supply chains.
ADC vs DAC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $200.8M | $262.2M |
| Net Profit | $62.2M | $130.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 49.1% | 47.9% |
| Net Margin | 31.0% | 49.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.7% | 6.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 32.0% | -7.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.04 | $7.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $200.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $190.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $183.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $175.5M | $262.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $160.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $154.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $152.6M | $246.3M |
| Q1 26 | $62.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $56.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.2M | $130.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.7M | $141.2M |
| Q1 26 | 49.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 48.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.7% | 47.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.7% | 56.8% |
| Q1 26 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.0% | 49.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.9% | 57.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.04 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.47 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.45 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.43 | $7.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $7.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.1M | $654.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.2B | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $10.2B | $4.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $25.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8M | $654.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.6M | $471.7M |
| Q1 26 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2B | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | $10.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0B | $4.0B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
