vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ADMA BIOLOGICS, INC. (ADMA) and UPWORK, INC (UPWK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

UPWORK, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($195.5M vs $139.2M, roughly 1.4× ADMA BIOLOGICS, INC.). ADMA BIOLOGICS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 35.5% vs 16.1%, a 19.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ADMA BIOLOGICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.4% vs 1.4%). ADMA BIOLOGICS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($34.6M vs $12.9M). Over the past eight quarters, ADMA BIOLOGICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (30.4% CAGR vs 0.6%).

ADMA Biologics Inc. is a biopharmaceutical enterprise focused on the research, development, manufacturing and commercialization of specialty plasma-derived immunoglobulin therapies. It primarily operates in the United States, catering to patients with primary immunodeficiency and other immune-related disorders, healthcare providers and medical institutions across its core immune health therapeutic segment.

Upwork Inc. is an American freelancing platform headquartered in Santa Clara and San Francisco, California. The company was formed in 2013 as Elance-oDesk after the merger of Elance Inc. and oDesk Corp. The merged company was subsequently rebranded as Upwork in 2015.

ADMA vs UPWK — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
UPWK
UPWK
1.4× larger
UPWK
$195.5M
$139.2M
ADMA
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ADMA
ADMA
+16.9% gap
ADMA
18.4%
1.4%
UPWK
Higher net margin
ADMA
ADMA
19.4% more per $
ADMA
35.5%
16.1%
UPWK
More free cash flow
ADMA
ADMA
$21.6M more FCF
ADMA
$34.6M
$12.9M
UPWK
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ADMA
ADMA
Annualised
ADMA
30.4%
0.6%
UPWK

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Revenue
$139.2M
$195.5M
Net Profit
$49.4M
$31.5M
Gross Margin
63.8%
77.2%
Operating Margin
45.1%
16.7%
Net Margin
35.5%
16.1%
Revenue YoY
18.4%
1.4%
Net Profit YoY
-55.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.20
$0.24

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
$195.5M
Q4 25
$139.2M
$198.4M
Q3 25
$134.2M
$201.7M
Q2 25
$122.0M
$194.9M
Q1 25
$114.8M
$192.7M
Q4 24
$117.5M
$191.5M
Q3 24
$119.8M
$193.8M
Q2 24
$107.2M
$193.1M
Net Profit
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
$31.5M
Q4 25
$49.4M
$15.6M
Q3 25
$36.4M
$29.3M
Q2 25
$34.2M
$32.7M
Q1 25
$26.9M
$37.7M
Q4 24
$111.9M
$147.2M
Q3 24
$35.9M
$27.8M
Q2 24
$32.1M
$22.2M
Gross Margin
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
77.2%
Q4 25
63.8%
78.0%
Q3 25
56.3%
77.3%
Q2 25
55.1%
77.7%
Q1 25
53.2%
78.3%
Q4 24
53.9%
77.7%
Q3 24
49.8%
77.6%
Q2 24
53.6%
77.3%
Operating Margin
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
16.7%
Q4 25
45.1%
14.3%
Q3 25
38.0%
14.8%
Q2 25
35.1%
16.7%
Q1 25
30.4%
20.1%
Q4 24
32.6%
7.1%
Q3 24
33.1%
10.7%
Q2 24
36.6%
9.2%
Net Margin
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
16.1%
Q4 25
35.5%
7.9%
Q3 25
27.1%
14.5%
Q2 25
28.1%
16.8%
Q1 25
23.4%
19.6%
Q4 24
95.2%
76.9%
Q3 24
30.0%
14.3%
Q2 24
29.9%
11.5%
EPS (diluted)
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
$0.24
Q4 25
$0.20
$0.12
Q3 25
$0.15
$0.21
Q2 25
$0.14
$0.24
Q1 25
$0.11
$0.27
Q4 24
$0.45
$1.02
Q3 24
$0.15
$0.20
Q2 24
$0.13
$0.17

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$87.6M
$328.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$72.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$477.3M
$569.6M
Total Assets
$624.2M
$1.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.15×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
$328.4M
Q4 25
$87.6M
$672.8M
Q3 25
$61.4M
$643.1M
Q2 25
$90.3M
$634.6M
Q1 25
$71.6M
$622.1M
Q4 24
$103.1M
$622.1M
Q3 24
$86.7M
$601.2M
Q2 24
$88.2M
$497.7M
Total Debt
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
Q4 25
$72.1M
$359.8M
Q3 25
$72.4M
$359.3M
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$72.3M
$357.9M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
$569.6M
Q4 25
$477.3M
$630.3M
Q3 25
$431.2M
$628.1M
Q2 25
$398.3M
$608.7M
Q1 25
$373.4M
$594.3M
Q4 24
$349.0M
$575.4M
Q3 24
$231.9M
$411.2M
Q2 24
$188.3M
$361.1M
Total Assets
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
$1.2B
Q4 25
$624.2M
$1.3B
Q3 25
$568.7M
$1.3B
Q2 25
$558.4M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$510.6M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$488.7M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$390.6M
$1.1B
Q2 24
$376.4M
$1.0B
Debt / Equity
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.15×
0.57×
Q3 25
0.17×
0.57×
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.21×
0.62×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$35.6M
$23.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$34.6M
$12.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
24.8%
6.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.72×
0.73×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$27.8M
$220.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
$23.0M
Q4 25
$35.6M
$63.7M
Q3 25
$13.3M
$75.1M
Q2 25
$21.1M
$72.5M
Q1 25
$-19.7M
$37.0M
Q4 24
$50.2M
$38.6M
Q3 24
$25.0M
$61.0M
Q2 24
$45.6M
$39.2M
Free Cash Flow
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
$12.9M
Q4 25
$34.6M
$63.2M
Q3 25
$-1.1M
$74.6M
Q2 25
$18.7M
$70.1M
Q1 25
$-24.4M
$34.5M
Q4 24
$47.5M
$37.0M
Q3 24
$24.0M
$59.8M
Q2 24
$43.6M
$38.6M
FCF Margin
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
6.6%
Q4 25
24.8%
31.9%
Q3 25
-0.8%
37.0%
Q2 25
15.3%
36.0%
Q1 25
-21.2%
17.9%
Q4 24
40.4%
19.3%
Q3 24
20.0%
30.8%
Q2 24
40.7%
20.0%
Capex Intensity
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.8%
0.2%
Q3 25
10.7%
0.2%
Q2 25
2.0%
1.2%
Q1 25
4.1%
1.3%
Q4 24
2.3%
0.8%
Q3 24
0.9%
0.6%
Q2 24
1.9%
0.3%
Cash Conversion
ADMA
ADMA
UPWK
UPWK
Q1 26
0.73×
Q4 25
0.72×
4.07×
Q3 25
0.36×
2.56×
Q2 25
0.62×
2.22×
Q1 25
-0.73×
0.98×
Q4 24
0.45×
0.26×
Q3 24
0.70×
2.20×
Q2 24
1.42×
1.76×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ADMA
ADMA

ADMA Bio Manufacturing Segment$123.1M88%
Other$16.0M12%

UPWK
UPWK

Marketplace$170.7M87%
Enterprise$24.8M13%

Related Comparisons