vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ameren (AEE) and Fabrinet (FN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ameren is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.6× Fabrinet). Ameren runs the higher net margin — 14.2% vs 9.9%, a 4.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fabrinet posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (35.9% vs -8.2%). Fabrinet produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-5.3M vs $-54.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Fabrinet's revenue compounded faster (24.4% CAGR vs -0.9%).
Ameren Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a public utility holding company in the United States. It operates through four segments: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission. The company engages in the rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution activities; and rate-regulated natural gas distribution and transmission businesses. It primarily generates electricity through coal, nucle...
FabrinetFNEarnings & Financial Report
Below is a list of companies having stocks that are included in the S&P MidCap 400 stock market index. The index, maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices, comprises the common stocks of 400 mid-cap, mostly American, companies. Although called the S&P 400, the index sometimes contains more than 400 stocks when it includes two or more share classes of stock from one of its component companies.
AEE vs FN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $253.0M | $112.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | 10.1% |
| Net Margin | 14.2% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | 35.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | 30.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.92 | $3.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $978.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $909.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $871.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $833.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $804.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $753.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $731.5M |
| Q4 25 | $253.0M | $112.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $641.0M | $95.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.0M | $81.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.0M | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $457.0M | $77.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.0M | $81.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $262.0M | $80.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.4% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.92 | $3.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.35 | $2.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $2.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.07 | $2.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.70 | $2.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.97 | $2.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $2.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.0M | $960.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $19.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $48.5B | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.45× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | $960.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $968.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $934.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.0M | $950.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $934.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $908.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0M | $858.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.0M | $794.0M |
| Q4 25 | $19.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $48.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.3B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $956.0M | $46.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-54.0M | $-5.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.0% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 56.7% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.78× | 0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-775.0M | $102.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $956.0M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $102.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $862.0M | $55.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $74.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $817.0M | $115.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $897.0M | $83.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $557.0M | $83.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $492.0M | $100.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-54.0M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.0M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-204.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-633.0M | $45.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-473.0M | $94.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-240.0M | $62.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-445.0M | $70.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-398.0M | $87.3M |
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.4% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.9% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 56.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.0% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.78× | 0.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.11× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.49× | 0.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.93× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.96× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 1.02× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.88× | 1.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AEE
Segment breakdown not available.
FN
| Optical Communications | $832.6M | 73% |
| Non Optical Communications | $300.3M | 27% |
