vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ameren (AEE) and JBT Marel Corp (JBTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ameren is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.8× JBT Marel Corp). Ameren runs the higher net margin — 14.2% vs 5.3%, a 8.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JBT Marel Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (115.6% vs -8.2%). JBT Marel Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($83.5M vs $-54.0M). Over the past eight quarters, JBT Marel Corp's revenue compounded faster (60.3% CAGR vs -0.9%).
Ameren Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a public utility holding company in the United States. It operates through four segments: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission. The company engages in the rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution activities; and rate-regulated natural gas distribution and transmission businesses. It primarily generates electricity through coal, nucle...
JBT Marel Corporation, formerly known as JBT Corporation, or John Bean Technologies Corporation, is a food processing machinery and automated vehicle company. The company was incorporated in 2008 when FMC Technologies divested its non-energy businesses. The company is based in Chicago, Illinois and traces its history back to a company founded in 1884 by John Bean, an orchardist in Los Gatos, California.
AEE vs JBTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $253.0M | $53.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.5% |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | 7.2% |
| Net Margin | 14.2% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | 115.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | 858.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.92 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $934.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $854.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $467.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $453.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $402.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $392.3M |
| Q4 25 | $253.0M | $53.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $641.0M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.0M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.0M | $-173.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.0M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $457.0M | $38.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.0M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $262.0M | $22.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.8% |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.5% | -3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | 7.4% |
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | -20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.4% | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.92 | $1.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.35 | $1.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.07 | $-3.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.70 | $1.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.97 | $0.95 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $0.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.0M | $167.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $19.4B | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4B | $4.5B |
| Total Assets | $48.5B | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.45× | 0.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | $167.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $19.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $648.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $647.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $647.0M |
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $48.5B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.4B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.6B | $8.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7B | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.6B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.3B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.45× | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.43× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $956.0M | $117.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-54.0M | $83.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.0% | 8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 56.7% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.78× | 2.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-775.0M | $238.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $956.0M | $117.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $87.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $862.0M | $102.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $817.0M | $128.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $897.0M | $71.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $557.0M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $492.0M | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-54.0M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.0M | $56.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-204.0M | $83.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-633.0M | $14.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-473.0M | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-240.0M | $65.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-445.0M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-398.0M | $-100.0K |
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.4% | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.0% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.9% | -0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 56.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.0% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.78× | 2.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.11× | 30.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.93× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.96× | 1.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.88× | 0.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
