vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ameren (AEE) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.4× Ameren). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 14.2%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -8.2%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $-54.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs -0.9%).
Ameren Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a public utility holding company in the United States. It operates through four segments: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission. The company engages in the rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution activities; and rate-regulated natural gas distribution and transmission businesses. It primarily generates electricity through coal, nucle...
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
AEE vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $253.0M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 14.2% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.92 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $253.0M | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $641.0M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.0M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.0M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.0M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $457.0M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $262.0M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.5% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.4% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.92 | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.35 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.07 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.70 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.97 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.0M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $19.4B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $48.5B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.45× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.0M | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | $19.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $48.5B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.4B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.6B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.6B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.3B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.3B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.45× | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $956.0M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-54.0M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.0% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 56.7% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.78× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-775.0M | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $956.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $862.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $817.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $897.0M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $557.0M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $492.0M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-54.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-204.0M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-633.0M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-473.0M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-240.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-445.0M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-398.0M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.4% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.9% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | 56.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.0% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.78× | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.11× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.49× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.93× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.96× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.88× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AEE
Segment breakdown not available.
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
