vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alset Inc. (AEI) and Serve Robotics Inc. (SERV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Alset Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3M vs $881.5K, roughly 1.5× Serve Robotics Inc.). On growth, Serve Robotics Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (400.1% vs -85.4%). Alset Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-6.1M vs $-46.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Serve Robotics Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-3.5% CAGR vs -53.7%).
Alset Global GmbH is an Austrian technology and engineering company based in Graz that specialises in hydrogen-based clean mobility products. Alset Global is known for developing a Hybrid Hydrogen internal combustion engine that can run on either pure petrol, pure hydrogen or a combination of both. This technology offers a sustainable and clean alternative to petrol-based internal combustion engines. The technology has been developed to create an alternative technology to meet new emission ta...
Ecovacs Robotics is a Chinese technology company. It is best known for developing in-home robotic appliances. The company was founded in 1998 by Qian Dongqi and is headquartered in Suzhou, China. According to Global Asia, Ecovacs Robotics had more than 60% of the Chinese market for robots by 2013. In 2023, Nikkei Asia had reported that the market capitalisation of Ecovacs Robotics has grown to near $6.38 billion, which is "roughly 5 times" that of the market capitalisation of rivalling US bas...
AEI vs SERV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3M | $881.5K |
| Net Profit | — | $-34.3M |
| Gross Margin | 35.2% | -757.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -4572.1% |
| Net Margin | — | -3888.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -85.4% | 400.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1491.5% | -161.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $881.5K | ||
| Q3 25 | $998.8K | $687.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $642.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $440.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9M | $176.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | $222.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $468.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1M | $946.7K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-34.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.2M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.3M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.8M | $-9.0M |
| Q4 25 | 35.2% | -757.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | -637.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.3% | -445.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.2% | -333.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.4% | -371.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.5% | -70.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.4% | 30.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.5% | 62.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4572.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -258.2% | -5067.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -250.7% | -3527.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -368.1% | -3406.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | -7701.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.4% | -3804.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -249.3% | -1828.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -37.2% | -814.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3888.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 151.4% | -4806.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -748.1% | -3247.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -780.1% | -3000.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.0% | -7441.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | -3601.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -109.9% | -1931.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -111.2% | -954.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.71 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.78 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.24 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.73 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.2M | $106.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $121.1M | $350.7M |
| Total Assets | $136.6M | $367.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $25.2M | $106.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.5M | $116.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6M | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.2M | $197.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.2M | $123.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $50.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $28.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $116.5K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.1K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.9K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $137.8K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.8K | — |
| Q4 25 | $121.1M | $350.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | $283.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.8M | $207.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.4M | $210.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.3M | $131.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.2M | $56.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.4M | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.7M | $-8.8M |
| Q4 25 | $136.6M | $367.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $299.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.0M | $214.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $90.5M | $216.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.8M | $139.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $98.8M | $61.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $32.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $96.7M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.9M | $-29.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.1M | $-46.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -467.7% | -5234.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.4% | 1872.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.8M | $-117.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-5.9M | $-29.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $883.4K | $-25.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.1M | $-46.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $822.4K | $-36.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $-22.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $-4.1M |
| Q4 25 | -467.7% | -5234.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.3% | -5314.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -245.9% | -3426.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -357.3% | -2934.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 56.5% | -6307.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -58.2% | -4529.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -392.3% | -1396.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.8% | -431.1% |
| Q4 25 | 13.4% | 1872.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 1649.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 940.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 785.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 2755.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 2070.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 169.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
