vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Affinity Bancshares, Inc. (AFBI) and Beam Global (BEEM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Beam Global is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.0M vs $8.6M, roughly 1.1× Affinity Bancshares, Inc.). Affinity Bancshares, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.9% vs -25.8%, a 50.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Affinity Bancshares, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.8% vs 6.7%). Affinity Bancshares, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.2M vs $-3.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Affinity Bancshares, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.1% CAGR vs -21.2%).
Suntory Global Spirits Inc., formerly known as Beam Suntory, Inc., and before that as Beam, Inc., is an American beverage company that is a subsidiary of Suntory Holdings, a Japanese multinational beverage conglomerate. The company produces alcoholic beverages.
AFBI vs BEEM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.6M | $9.0M |
| Net Profit | $2.1M | $-2.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.8% |
| Operating Margin | 35.9% | -29.3% |
| Net Margin | 24.9% | -25.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.8% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 58.5% | 49.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | $5.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.3M | $7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.6M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0M | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3M | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.3M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $-15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | $-3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.2% |
| Q4 25 | 35.9% | -29.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | -84.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.1% | -63.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.8% | -245.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.1% | -60.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.2% | -32.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | -20.9% |
| Q4 25 | 24.9% | -25.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | -84.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | -60.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | -245.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.7% | -54.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | -33.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.2% | -20.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.28 | $-1.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.21 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.26 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.16 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.20 | $-0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $53.9M | $969.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $127.0M | $24.8M |
| Total Assets | $881.7M | $42.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $53.9M | $969.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $84.8M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $61.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $127.0M | $24.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.4M | $26.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.1M | $26.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $122.3M | $26.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.1M | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.4M | $46.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $125.1M | $43.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.3M | $46.9M |
| Q4 25 | $881.7M | $42.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $925.2M | $44.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $933.8M | $46.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $912.5M | $46.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $866.8M | $61.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $878.6M | $67.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $873.6M | $71.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $869.5M | $75.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $11.6M | $-3.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $11.2M | $-3.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 130.9% | -42.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.9% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.46× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $20.3M | $-11.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.6M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8M | $-318.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8M | $859.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $619.0K | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2M | $-3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $11.2M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4M | $462.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $489.0K | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $-3.1M |
| Q4 25 | 130.9% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.3% | -87.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | -15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.7% | -28.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 83.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.5% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.8% | -21.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 5.46× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.36× | -2.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.60× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.91× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AFBI
Segment breakdown not available.
BEEM
| Products | $7.0M | 77% |
| Other | $2.0M | 23% |