vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aflac (AFL) and CNH Industrial N.V. (CNH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aflac is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.9B vs $4.5B, roughly 1.1× CNH Industrial N.V.). Aflac runs the higher net margin — 28.3% vs 1.9%, a 26.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CNH Industrial N.V. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.8% vs -10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, CNH Industrial N.V.'s revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs -5.4%).
Aflac Incorporated is an American insurance company and is the largest provider of supplemental insurance in the United States. It was founded in 1955 and is based in Columbus, Georgia. In the U.S., it underwrites a wide range of insurance policies, but is perhaps more known for its payroll deduction insurance coverage, which pays cash benefits when a policyholder has a covered accident or illness. The company states it "provides financial protection to more than 50 million people worldwide".
CNH Industrial N.V.CNHEarnings & Financial Report
CNH Industrial NV is an Italian-American multinational corporation with global headquarters in Basildon, United Kingdom, but controlled and mostly owned by the multinational investment company Exor, which in turn is controlled by the Agnelli family. Through its various businesses, CNH Industrial designs, produces, and sells agricultural machinery and construction equipment. Present in all major markets worldwide, CNH Industrial is focused on expanding its presence in high-growth markets, incl...
AFL vs CNH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.9B | $4.5B |
| Net Profit | $1.4B | $86.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 18.4% |
| Operating Margin | 32.3% | 3.0% |
| Net Margin | 28.3% | 1.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | 7.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.5% | -18.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.58 | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $86.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $599.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.0M | $131.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $106.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-93.0M | $306.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $433.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $401.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.7% |
| Q4 25 | 32.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.3% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.9% | 11.6% |
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 35.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.6% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $2.58 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.08 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.11 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.45 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.10 | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.25 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.2B | $2.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $29.5B | $7.8B |
| Total Assets | $116.5B | $42.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1B | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $29.5B | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.2B | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3B | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.1B | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.8B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0B | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.5B | $8.0B |
| Q4 25 | $116.5B | $42.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.3B | $43.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.7B | $43.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.3B | $42.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $117.6B | $42.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.4B | $44.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $120.2B | $44.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.7B | $45.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $315.0M | $945.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.23× | 10.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $315.0M | $945.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $659.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $399.0M | $772.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $589.0M | $162.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $333.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $791.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.0M | $379.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $849.0M | $-894.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.23× | 10.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.76× | 8.24× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 3.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.31× | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.18× | 15.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.15× | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | -2.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AFL
| Aflac Japan | $2.3B | 47% |
| Aflac US | $1.7B | 35% |
| Other | $862.0M | 18% |
CNH
| Agricultural Equipment Segment | $3.6B | 81% |
| Construction Equipment Segment | $853.0M | 19% |
| Services | $18.0M | 0% |
