vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ABUNDIA GLOBAL IMPACT GROUP, INC. (AGIG) and PETROBRAS - PETROLEO BRASILEIRO SA (PBR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ABUNDIA GLOBAL IMPACT GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 22251.6% vs 22.6%, a 22228.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PETROBRAS - PETROLEO BRASILEIRO SA posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-10.4% vs -116.8%).
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A., better known by and trading as the portmanteau Petrobras, is a Brazilian majority state-owned multinational corporation in the petroleum industry, which is headquartered in Rio de Janeiro. The company's name translates to Brazilian Petroleum Corporation.
AGIG vs PBR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $-27.9K | $21.0B |
| Net Profit | $-6.2M | $4.8B |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20546.5% | 25.4% |
| Net Margin | 22251.6% | 22.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -116.8% | -10.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -273.1% | 1563.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.88 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $-27.9K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.7K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.6K | $21.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.3K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.2K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.8K | $23.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.7K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-6.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-281.8K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.7K | $-325.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 20546.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8915.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1648.5% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1037.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4016.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -418.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -354.3% | 28.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -276.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 22251.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9042.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1623.5% | 22.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1008.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1001.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -216.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 342.6% | -1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1392.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.88 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.60 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.11 | $0.37 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6M | $7.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $19.0M | $73.6B |
| Total Assets | $31.9M | $215.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.8K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | $73.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $67.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | $215.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $190.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-552.1K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.8K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.09× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
