vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AGIOS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (AGIO) and TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. (MITT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($20.4M vs $20.0M, roughly 1.0× AGIOS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.). TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 65.0% vs -541.1%, a 606.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AGIOS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (86.1% vs 17.7%). Over the past eight quarters, AGIOS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (56.1% CAGR vs 9.1%).
Agios Pharmaceuticals Inc. is a publicly trading American pharmaceutical company pioneering therapies for genetically defined diseases, with a near-term focus on developing therapies for hemolytic anemias. The company was founded in 2008 by Lewis Cantley, Tak Mak and Craig Thompson. Agios is a Delaware corporation headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The company tendered an initial public offering in July 2013.
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust, Inc. is a real estate investment trust managed by global alternative asset firm TPG. It primarily invests in residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, performing and non-performing mortgage loans, and other credit-linked real estate assets, with its core market being the United States. It generates returns via net interest income from holdings and strategic asset disposition gains.
AGIO vs MITT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $20.0M | $20.4M |
| Net Profit | $-108.0M | $13.3M |
| Gross Margin | 90.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -608.9% | 67.1% |
| Net Margin | -541.1% | 65.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 86.1% | 17.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -11.9% | -7.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.86 | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $20.0M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.9M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5M | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.7M | $18.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7M | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.6M | $16.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.2M | $17.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-108.0M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-103.4M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-112.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-89.3M | $11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-96.5M | $14.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $947.9M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-96.1M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-81.5M | $20.9M |
| Q4 25 | 90.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 87.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 88.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 91.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 82.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 92.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -608.9% | 67.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -907.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1020.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1222.0% | 54.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1165.3% | 76.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1146.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1228.3% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1124.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -541.1% | 65.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -803.1% | 102.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -899.4% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1023.3% | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -899.6% | 82.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10574.7% | 111.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1115.7% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -995.8% | 121.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.86 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.78 | $0.47 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.93 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.55 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.44 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.22 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.69 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.45 | $0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $89.1M | $57.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $560.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $8.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $89.1M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.7M | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.9M | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.0M | $115.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.2M | $118.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.7M | $102.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.5M | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.8M | $100.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $560.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $559.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $536.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $543.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $543.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $540.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $660.5M | $533.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $743.9M | $539.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $773.1M | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $849.7M | $6.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-96.2M | $59.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-97.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -487.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-377.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-96.2M | $59.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-88.2M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-77.1M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-111.5M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-133.2M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-84.2M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-72.6M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-99.9M | $12.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-97.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-89.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-78.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-134.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-84.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-72.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-100.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -487.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -696.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -626.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1286.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1250.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -944.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -844.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1221.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.91× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.09× | 0.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.