vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of FEDERAL AGRICULTURAL MORTGAGE CORP (AGM) and ZIPRECRUITER, INC. (ZIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ZIPRECRUITER, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($111.7M vs $107.5M, roughly 1.0× FEDERAL AGRICULTURAL MORTGAGE CORP). On growth, FEDERAL AGRICULTURAL MORTGAGE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.1% vs 0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, FEDERAL AGRICULTURAL MORTGAGE CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs -4.4%).
The Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, also known as Farmer Mac, is a stockholder-owned, federally chartered corporation established by the U.S. Congress in 1988 under the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987. It was created to establish a secondary market for agricultural real estate and housing mortgage loans, to increase liquidity and the availability of long-term, stable credit for farmers, ranchers, and rural communities.
ZipRecruiter, Inc. is an American employment marketplace for job seekers and employers.
AGM vs ZIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $107.5M | $111.7M |
| Net Profit | — | $-835.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | 56.3% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | — | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.1% | 0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 92.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.69 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $107.5M | $111.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.0M | $115.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.6M | $112.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.3M | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.3M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.3M | $117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.9M | $123.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.7M | $122.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-835.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.0M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.8M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.7M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.5M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.8M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.1M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.7M | $-6.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 89.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 89.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 89.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.1% |
| Q4 25 | 56.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.1% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.8% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.9% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 67.5% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 69.0% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 65.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.8% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.9% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.4% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.6% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.8% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.2% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 57.4% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $3.69 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.44 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.48 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.01 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.62 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.86 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.68 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.28 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $188.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $30.8B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $-77.2M |
| Total Assets | $35.4B | $569.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 17.93× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $188.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $203.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $221.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $218.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $842.1M | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $923.0M | $271.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $745.1M | $282.5M |
| Q4 25 | $30.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $-77.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $-76.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $-65.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $-11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $35.4B | $569.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.4B | $573.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.0B | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.8B | $629.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.3B | $664.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6B | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.2B | $665.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.8B | $662.4M |
| Q4 25 | 17.93× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.70× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.48× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.11× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $80.1M | $7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $9.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $80.1M | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-47.7M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.8M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $612.6M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-44.4M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.1M | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $233.3M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $607.4M | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-44.4M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.6M | $21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $231.7M | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 599.8% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -49.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 247.3% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.84× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.19× | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.34× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AGM
Segment breakdown not available.
ZIP
| License | $84.3M | 75% |
| Services | $27.4M | 25% |
