vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Axe Compute Inc. (AGPU) and ALPHA PRO TECH LTD (APT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALPHA PRO TECH LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.9M vs $8.7K, roughly 1598.2× Axe Compute Inc.). ALPHA PRO TECH LTD runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -1740028.0%, a 1740033.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALPHA PRO TECH LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.3% vs -1.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Axe Compute Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (33.6% CAGR vs 1.4%).
Alpha Pro Tech Ltd is a leading developer, manufacturer and marketer of disposable protective apparel, face masks, and building supply products including weather-resistant barriers. It primarily serves the healthcare, industrial, and construction sectors, with core operating markets concentrated in North America.
AGPU vs APT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.7K | $13.9M |
| Net Profit | $-150.9M | $698.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.1% |
| Operating Margin | -1990880.1% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | -1740028.0% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.3% | 0.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6856.6% | -17.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.7K | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6K | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7K | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.3K | $13.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8K | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9K | $14.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.3K | $16.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9K | $13.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-150.9M | $698.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-77.7M | $976.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.4M | $613.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.2M | $847.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $862.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.2M | $576.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -131.0% | 39.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -579.4% | 36.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.1% | 39.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -250.5% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -186.1% | 38.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 79.4% | 42.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -361.8% | 40.2% |
| Q4 25 | -1990880.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -90654.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -99174.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2073.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23848.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -55296.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3664.6% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -73734.7% | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | -1740028.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2146264.3% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -77198.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2214.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24676.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -79208.9% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4730.1% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -86843.2% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.8M | $17.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $47.7M | $62.5M |
| Total Assets | $52.9M | $74.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.8M | $17.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.7K | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $506.1K | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1M | $13.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $611.8K | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3M | $16.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $18.5M |
| Q4 25 | $47.7M | $62.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-77.4M | $62.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $62.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-145.8K | $61.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-202.6K | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $62.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $62.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1M | $61.6M |
| Q4 25 | $52.9M | $74.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $73.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | $73.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9M | $72.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0M | $73.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $73.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6M | $72.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6M | $72.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.9M | $318.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $51.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | $318.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-985.8K | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $-873.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $51.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | $970.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.4M | $-1.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -29.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23429.1% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -6.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -70379.8% | -9.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 73.7% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 15.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.4% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.