vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ARGAN INC (AGX) and Phoenix Asia Holdings Ltd (PHOE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ARGAN INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($251.2M vs $3.8M, roughly 66.3× Phoenix Asia Holdings Ltd). Phoenix Asia Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 16.7% vs 12.2%, a 4.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
ARGAN INCAGXEarnings & Financial Report
Argan Inc. is a diversified holding company that provides comprehensive engineering, construction, project management and consulting services. Its core operating segments focus on power generation, telecommunications, industrial infrastructure and renewable energy projects, primarily serving public and private sector clients across North America.
Phoenix Television is a majority state-owned television network that operates Mandarin and Cantonese-language channels serving mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and other regions with significant Chinese-speaking audiences. It is headquartered in Shenzhen and Hong Kong and is also registered in the Cayman Islands.
AGX vs PHOE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $251.2M | $3.8M |
| Net Profit | $30.7M | $631.4K |
| Gross Margin | 18.7% | 28.5% |
| Operating Margin | 13.0% | 19.8% |
| Net Margin | 12.2% | 16.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.17 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $251.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $237.7M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $193.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $232.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $257.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $164.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $30.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.3M | $631.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.17 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.50 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.60 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.26 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.00 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.31 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.89 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $423.7M | $1.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $419.7M | $7.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $8.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $423.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $275.5M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $304.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $298.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $302.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $306.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $419.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $393.2M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $363.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $328.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $308.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $293.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $290.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $882.7M | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $792.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $836.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $768.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $726.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $624.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $598.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $172.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $171.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 68.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.61× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $283.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $172.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $171.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $24.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 68.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.24× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.05× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AGX
| Power Industry Services | $195.5M | 78% |
| Industrial Construction Services | $49.4M | 20% |
| Telecommunications Infrastructure Services | $6.3M | 3% |
PHOE
Segment breakdown not available.