vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Business Partners L.P. (BBU) and Phoenix Asia Holdings Ltd (PHOE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Business Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.7B vs $3.8M, roughly 1766.7× Phoenix Asia Holdings Ltd). Phoenix Asia Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 16.7% vs 2.0%, a 14.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Brookfield Business Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership and the primary public vehicle through which Brookfield Corporation, its parent company, owns and operates the business services and industrial operations of its private equity group. It was formed through a spin-off from Brookfield Asset Management in June 2016.
Phoenix Television is a majority state-owned television network that operates Mandarin and Cantonese-language channels serving mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and other regions with significant Chinese-speaking audiences. It is headquartered in Shenzhen and Hong Kong and is also registered in the Cayman Islands.
BBU vs PHOE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2025 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.7B | $3.8M |
| Net Profit | $135.0M | $631.4K |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 19.8% |
| Net Margin | 2.0% | 16.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -44.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 107.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.12 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $13.5B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $14.6B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $631.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $41.0M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $280.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 1.9% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $0.62 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.3B | $1.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.3B | $7.5M |
| Total Assets | $75.3B | $8.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $2.4B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.2B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $18.9B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $14.0B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $75.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $81.5B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $90.3B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $77.3B | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.