vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AGILYSYS INC (AGYS) and Arbe Robotics Ltd. (ARBE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AGILYSYS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($80.4M vs $458.0K, roughly 175.5× Arbe Robotics Ltd.). AGILYSYS INC runs the higher net margin — 12.3% vs -2218.6%, a 2230.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. AGILYSYS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($22.7M vs $-9.0M).
Agilysys Inc. is an American software company that develops and markets proprietary enterprise software and other products for the hospitality industry. The company specializes in point of sale, property management, inventory and procurement, document management, workforce management, and mobile and wireless products.
Arbe Robotics Ltd. is an Israeli technology company that develops 4D imaging radar chipsets and perception solutions for advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous vehicles. Headquartered in Tel Aviv, it is listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol ARBE.
AGYS vs ARBE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $80.4M | $458.0K |
| Net Profit | $9.9M | $-10.2M |
| Gross Margin | 62.5% | -16.6% |
| Operating Margin | 14.6% | -2528.8% |
| Net Margin | 12.3% | -2218.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 158.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.35 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $80.4M | $458.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.3M | $254.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.7M | $274.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $40.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $123.0K |
| Q4 25 | $9.9M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-13.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-12.6M |
| Q4 25 | 62.5% | -16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.7% | -95.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 61.7% | -67.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -745.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -220.3% |
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | -2528.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.8% | -4531.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | -4189.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -33402.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10119.5% |
| Q4 25 | 12.3% | -2218.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.8% | -4344.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | -3707.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -34545.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10222.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.35 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.41 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $81.5M | $44.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $313.1M | $39.6M |
| Total Assets | $475.2M | $73.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $81.5M | $44.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.3M | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.6M | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $18.8M |
| Q4 25 | $313.1M | $39.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $296.7M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $283.2M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.2M |
| Q4 25 | $475.2M | $73.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $425.6M | $66.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $426.0M | $75.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $23.3M | $-9.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $22.7M | $-9.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.3% | -1974.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 6.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.35× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-38.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.3M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.2M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.3M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-7.8M |
| Q4 25 | $22.7M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.0M | $-11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | -1974.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.9% | -4448.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | -4319.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -15617.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6408.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 60.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 62.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 96.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.89× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AGYS
| Subscription And Maintenance | $52.0M | 65% |
| Professional Services | $17.7M | 22% |
| Products | $10.7M | 13% |
ARBE
Segment breakdown not available.
