vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (AHH) and Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($98.9M vs $75.6M, roughly 1.3× Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.). Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.4% vs 3.1%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.8% vs -3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.8% CAGR vs -22.8%).

Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. is a publicly traded U.S. real estate investment trust operating across the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast regions. It develops, owns, and manages a diversified portfolio of office, retail, and multifamily residential properties, and also offers construction and development services for third-party clients.

Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. is a leading provider of concrete pumping services and equipment rental solutions across the U.S. and U.K. It serves core construction segments including infrastructure, commercial real estate development, and residential building, supporting efficient, safe concrete placement for projects of all sizes.

AHH vs BBCP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BBCP
BBCP
1.3× larger
BBCP
$98.9M
$75.6M
AHH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
AHH
AHH
+3.9% gap
AHH
0.8%
-3.2%
BBCP
Higher net margin
BBCP
BBCP
2.2% more per $
BBCP
5.4%
3.1%
AHH
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BBCP
BBCP
Annualised
BBCP
4.8%
-22.8%
AHH

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Revenue
$75.6M
$98.9M
Net Profit
$2.4M
$5.3M
Gross Margin
43.8%
Operating Margin
31.0%
17.0%
Net Margin
3.1%
5.4%
Revenue YoY
0.8%
-3.2%
Net Profit YoY
-89.8%
-43.6%
EPS (diluted)
$0.00
$0.09

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
$75.6M
$98.9M
Q3 25
$72.7M
$94.2M
Q2 25
$69.1M
$85.2M
Q1 25
$67.8M
$78.0M
Q4 24
$75.0M
$102.1M
Q3 24
$114.4M
$100.6M
Q2 24
$116.8M
$98.7M
Q1 24
$127.0M
$90.0M
Net Profit
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
$2.4M
$5.3M
Q3 25
$80.0K
$3.7M
Q2 25
$5.9M
$-4.0K
Q1 25
$-2.8M
$-2.6M
Q4 24
$23.4M
$9.4M
Q3 24
$-5.0M
$7.6M
Q2 24
$3.2M
$3.0M
Q1 24
$14.1M
$-3.8M
Gross Margin
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
43.8%
Q3 25
42.9%
Q2 25
42.5%
Q1 25
40.0%
Q4 24
45.3%
Q3 24
45.0%
44.3%
Q2 24
41.8%
42.3%
Q1 24
37.9%
37.0%
Operating Margin
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
31.0%
17.0%
Q3 25
29.2%
13.7%
Q2 25
29.6%
9.7%
Q1 25
23.2%
4.5%
Q4 24
50.1%
18.8%
Q3 24
19.0%
16.5%
Q2 24
11.9%
12.2%
Q1 24
15.1%
1.6%
Net Margin
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
3.1%
5.4%
Q3 25
0.1%
3.9%
Q2 25
8.6%
-0.0%
Q1 25
-4.1%
-3.4%
Q4 24
31.2%
9.2%
Q3 24
-4.4%
7.5%
Q2 24
2.7%
3.1%
Q1 24
11.1%
-4.3%
EPS (diluted)
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
$0.00
$0.09
Q3 25
$-0.04
$0.07
Q2 25
$0.04
$-0.01
Q1 25
$-0.07
$-0.06
Q4 24
$0.28
$0.16
Q3 24
$-0.11
$0.13
Q2 24
$0.00
$0.05
Q1 24
$0.17
$-0.08

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$49.1M
$44.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.5B
$417.9M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$627.8M
$264.8M
Total Assets
$2.6B
$879.5M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
2.43×
1.58×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
$49.1M
$44.4M
Q3 25
$46.5M
$41.0M
Q2 25
$52.1M
$37.8M
Q1 25
$45.7M
$85.1M
Q4 24
$31.9M
$43.0M
Q3 24
$43.9M
$26.3M
Q2 24
$20.3M
$18.0M
Q1 24
$41.9M
$14.7M
Total Debt
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
$1.5B
$417.9M
Q3 25
$1.5B
$417.6M
Q2 25
$1.4B
$417.3M
Q1 25
$1.3B
$417.1M
Q4 24
$1.3B
$373.3M
Q3 24
$1.3B
$372.9M
Q2 24
$1.4B
$372.6M
Q1 24
$1.4B
$372.2M
Stockholders' Equity
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
$627.8M
$264.8M
Q3 25
$638.8M
$261.3M
Q2 25
$652.0M
$261.8M
Q1 25
$657.4M
$260.7M
Q4 24
$670.6M
$321.7M
Q3 24
$663.9M
$314.7M
Q2 24
$562.7M
$308.3M
Q1 24
$571.4M
$307.9M
Total Assets
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
$2.6B
$879.5M
Q3 25
$2.6B
$886.0M
Q2 25
$2.6B
$878.8M
Q1 25
$2.5B
$912.9M
Q4 24
$2.5B
$898.0M
Q3 24
$2.6B
$890.8M
Q2 24
$2.6B
$894.7M
Q1 24
$2.6B
$894.8M
Debt / Equity
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
2.43×
1.58×
Q3 25
2.33×
1.60×
Q2 25
2.22×
1.59×
Q1 25
2.01×
1.60×
Q4 24
1.93×
1.16×
Q3 24
2.00×
1.19×
Q2 24
2.52×
1.21×
Q1 24
2.50×
1.21×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$64.2M
$14.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$1.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
1.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
12.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
26.99×
2.72×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$17.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
$64.2M
$14.5M
Q3 25
$26.3M
$19.1M
Q2 25
$11.1M
$24.7M
Q1 25
$107.0K
$6.0M
Q4 24
$112.0M
$22.4M
Q3 24
$27.3M
$35.0M
Q2 24
$17.4M
$9.1M
Q1 24
$46.5M
$20.3M
Free Cash Flow
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
$1.9M
Q3 25
$4.3M
Q2 25
$11.1M
Q1 25
$191.0K
Q4 24
$16.1M
Q3 24
$26.4M
Q2 24
$-1.9M
Q1 24
$2.5M
FCF Margin
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
1.9%
Q3 25
4.6%
Q2 25
13.0%
Q1 25
0.2%
Q4 24
15.8%
Q3 24
26.2%
Q2 24
-1.9%
Q1 24
2.8%
Capex Intensity
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
12.7%
Q3 25
15.7%
Q2 25
16.0%
Q1 25
7.5%
Q4 24
6.2%
Q3 24
8.6%
Q2 24
11.2%
Q1 24
19.7%
Cash Conversion
AHH
AHH
BBCP
BBCP
Q4 25
26.99×
2.72×
Q3 25
328.63×
5.16×
Q2 25
1.87×
Q1 25
Q4 24
4.78×
2.38×
Q3 24
4.63×
Q2 24
5.48×
3.00×
Q1 24
3.30×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

AHH
AHH

Office Real Estate Segment$28.8M38%
Retail Real Estate Segment$25.4M34%
Multifamily Residential Real Estate$17.7M23%
Real Estate Financing Segment$3.6M5%

BBCP
BBCP

US Concrete Pumping$72.2M73%
US Concrete Waste Management Services$21.3M22%
Other$5.4M5%

Related Comparisons