vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Healthcare REIT, Inc. (AHR) and Teradyne (TER). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Teradyne is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $564.0M, roughly 2.3× American Healthcare REIT, Inc.). Teradyne runs the higher net margin — 31.1% vs 1.9%, a 29.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Teradyne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.0% vs 13.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Teradyne's revenue compounded faster (32.6% CAGR vs 11.7%).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
AHR vs TER — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $564.0M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $10.8M | $398.9M |
| Gross Margin | 14.8% | 60.9% |
| Operating Margin | 19.8% | 36.9% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 31.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.5% | 87.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 133.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $2.53 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $564.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $532.1M | $769.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $501.3M | $651.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $497.2M | $685.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $496.8M | $752.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $476.8M | $737.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $458.0M | $729.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $398.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.8M | $257.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.9M | $119.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.8M | $146.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.1M | $145.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $186.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.8% | 57.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 57.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | 59.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 58.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.6% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | 17.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 28.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.4% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.53 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $1.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $114.8M | $241.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $0 |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3B | — |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $4.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $241.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $114.8M | $293.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.4M | $272.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.5M | $339.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.1M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.7M | $553.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.8M | $510.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.1M | $421.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $0 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6B | $3.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.2M | $265.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.12× | 0.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $265.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $55.2M | $281.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.2M | $49.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.5M | $182.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.6M | $161.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.5M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.1M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.4M | $216.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $131.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $225.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $171.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.12× | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.92× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.21× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.02× | 1.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AHR
| Integrated Senior Health Campuses | $467.0M | 83% |
| SHOP | $97.0M | 17% |
TER
Segment breakdown not available.
