vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST INC (AHT) and Embecta Corp. (EMBC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Embecta Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($261.2M vs $259.0M, roughly 1.0× ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST INC). Embecta Corp. runs the higher net margin — 16.9% vs -26.8%, a 43.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Embecta Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.3% vs -6.0%). Embecta Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($16.6M vs $-86.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Embecta Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (-4.6% CAGR vs -7.7%).

Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust focused on upper-upscale full-service hotel properties across key U.S. urban, suburban and resort markets. Its portfolio holds assets under top global hospitality brands, serving business and leisure travelers, with a focus on long-term value growth and stable shareholder returns.

Embecta Corp. is a global medical technology company focused on diabetes care solutions. It designs, manufactures and distributes a full portfolio of products including insulin pen needles, syringes, infusion set components and related delivery devices, serving patients, healthcare providers and biopharmaceutical partners across North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and other major markets.

AHT vs EMBC — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
EMBC
EMBC
1.0× larger
EMBC
$261.2M
$259.0M
AHT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
EMBC
EMBC
+5.7% gap
EMBC
-0.3%
-6.0%
AHT
Higher net margin
EMBC
EMBC
43.7% more per $
EMBC
16.9%
-26.8%
AHT
More free cash flow
EMBC
EMBC
$103.4M more FCF
EMBC
$16.6M
$-86.8M
AHT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
EMBC
EMBC
Annualised
EMBC
-4.6%
-7.7%
AHT

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Revenue
$259.0M
$261.2M
Net Profit
$-69.3M
$44.1M
Gross Margin
61.9%
Operating Margin
-2.6%
31.9%
Net Margin
-26.8%
16.9%
Revenue YoY
-6.0%
-0.3%
Net Profit YoY
44.2%
EPS (diluted)
$-12.85
$0.74

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Q4 25
$259.0M
$261.2M
Q3 25
$266.1M
$264.0M
Q2 25
$302.0M
$295.5M
Q1 25
$277.4M
$259.0M
Q4 24
$275.5M
$261.9M
Q3 24
$276.6M
$286.1M
Q2 24
$316.5M
$272.5M
Q1 24
$303.9M
$287.2M
Net Profit
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Q4 25
$-69.3M
$44.1M
Q3 25
$-60.1M
$26.4M
Q2 25
$-30.4M
$45.5M
Q1 25
$-20.0M
$23.5M
Q4 24
$-124.2M
$0
Q3 24
$-57.9M
$14.6M
Q2 24
$50.3M
$14.7M
Q1 24
$71.6M
$28.9M
Gross Margin
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Q4 25
61.9%
Q3 25
60.0%
Q2 25
66.7%
Q1 25
63.4%
Q4 24
60.0%
Q3 24
60.7%
Q2 24
69.8%
Q1 24
64.6%
Operating Margin
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Q4 25
-2.6%
31.9%
Q3 25
4.6%
21.4%
Q2 25
16.3%
31.8%
Q1 25
22.2%
24.3%
Q4 24
-17.8%
11.0%
Q3 24
7.3%
9.2%
Q2 24
42.8%
20.5%
Q1 24
50.2%
13.6%
Net Margin
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Q4 25
-26.8%
16.9%
Q3 25
-22.6%
10.0%
Q2 25
-10.1%
15.4%
Q1 25
-7.2%
9.1%
Q4 24
-45.1%
Q3 24
-20.9%
5.1%
Q2 24
15.9%
5.4%
Q1 24
23.5%
10.1%
EPS (diluted)
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Q4 25
$-12.85
$0.74
Q3 25
$-11.35
$0.44
Q2 25
$-6.88
$0.78
Q1 25
$-4.91
$0.40
Q4 24
$-13.64
$0.00
Q3 24
$-12.39
$0.24
Q2 24
$2.50
$0.25
Q1 24
$5.99
$0.50

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$66.1M
$201.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.5B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-626.4M
$-613.1M
Total Assets
$2.8B
$1.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Q4 25
$66.1M
$201.3M
Q3 25
$81.9M
$225.5M
Q2 25
$100.0M
$230.6M
Q1 25
$85.8M
$209.3M
Q4 24
$112.9M
$210.0M
Q3 24
$119.7M
$267.5M
Q2 24
$121.8M
$275.1M
Q1 24
$111.1M
$299.8M
Total Debt
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Q4 25
$2.5B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$2.6B
Q1 25
$2.7B
Q4 24
$2.6B
Q3 24
$2.7B
$1.6B
Q2 24
$2.8B
Q1 24
$2.9B
Stockholders' Equity
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Q4 25
$-626.4M
$-613.1M
Q3 25
$-548.7M
$-650.6M
Q2 25
$-485.5M
$-669.6M
Q1 25
$-446.1M
$-736.2M
Q4 24
$-419.2M
$-768.8M
Q3 24
$-288.4M
$-738.3M
Q2 24
$-225.9M
$-763.7M
Q1 24
$-276.8M
$-769.6M
Total Assets
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Q4 25
$2.8B
$1.1B
Q3 25
$3.0B
$1.1B
Q2 25
$3.1B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$3.1B
$1.1B
Q4 24
$3.2B
$1.1B
Q3 24
$3.3B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$3.3B
$1.3B
Q1 24
$3.5B
$1.2B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-15.7M
$17.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-86.8M
$16.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-33.5%
6.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
27.5%
0.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.39×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-135.5M
$205.8M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Q4 25
$-15.7M
$17.2M
Q3 25
$5.5M
$84.0M
Q2 25
$16.3M
$81.2M
Q1 25
$-25.0M
$31.8M
Q4 24
$-23.6M
$-5.3M
Q3 24
$795.0K
$26.6M
Q2 24
$8.0M
$-2.1M
Q1 24
$-46.5M
$24.3M
Free Cash Flow
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Q4 25
$-86.8M
$16.6M
Q3 25
$-226.0K
$76.7M
Q2 25
$-3.6M
$80.8M
Q1 25
$-44.8M
$31.7M
Q4 24
$-131.6M
$-6.8M
Q3 24
$-21.8M
Q2 24
$-22.9M
$-11.8M
Q1 24
$-80.4M
$20.9M
FCF Margin
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Q4 25
-33.5%
6.4%
Q3 25
-0.1%
29.1%
Q2 25
-1.2%
27.3%
Q1 25
-16.2%
12.2%
Q4 24
-47.8%
-2.6%
Q3 24
-7.9%
Q2 24
-7.2%
-4.3%
Q1 24
-26.5%
7.3%
Capex Intensity
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Q4 25
27.5%
0.2%
Q3 25
2.1%
2.8%
Q2 25
6.6%
0.1%
Q1 25
7.2%
0.0%
Q4 24
39.2%
0.6%
Q3 24
8.2%
0.0%
Q2 24
9.8%
3.6%
Q1 24
11.2%
1.2%
Cash Conversion
AHT
AHT
EMBC
EMBC
Q4 25
0.39×
Q3 25
3.18×
Q2 25
1.78×
Q1 25
1.35×
Q4 24
Q3 24
1.82×
Q2 24
0.16×
-0.14×
Q1 24
-0.65×
0.84×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

AHT
AHT

Occupancy$190.2M73%
Food And Beverage$51.8M20%
Hotel Other$16.6M6%

EMBC
EMBC

Pen Needles$185.5M71%
Safety$37.3M14%
Syringes$30.7M12%
Manufacturing Facility$4.1M2%

Related Comparisons