vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of C3.ai, Inc. (AI) and HARTE HANKS INC (HHS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
C3.ai, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($75.1M vs $39.9M, roughly 1.9× HARTE HANKS INC). HARTE HANKS INC runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs -139.3%, a 144.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HARTE HANKS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-15.4% vs -20.3%). HARTE HANKS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-686.0K vs $-46.9M). Over the past eight quarters, C3.ai, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.1% CAGR vs -6.4%).
C3.ai, Inc. is a leading enterprise artificial intelligence software provider that develops and delivers scalable AI applications, platform tools, and industry-specific solutions for clients across sectors including manufacturing, energy, financial services, healthcare and public sector. Its offerings help organizations optimize operations, reduce costs, mitigate risks, and realize data-driven decision making.
Harte Hanks is a global marketing services company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts. Harte Hanks services include analytics, strategy, marketing technology, creative services, digital marketing, customer care, direct mail, logistics, and fulfillment.
AI vs HHS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.1M | $39.9M |
| Net Profit | $-104.7M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 40.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -149.2% | -0.3% |
| Net Margin | -139.3% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.3% | -15.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.75 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $75.1M | $39.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.3M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.7M | $38.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.8M | $41.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.3M | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.2M | $47.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.6M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.4M | $45.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-104.7M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-116.8M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-79.7M | $-335.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.2M | $-392.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-66.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.8M | $142.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-72.9M | $-27.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-72.6M | $-171.0K |
| Q4 25 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 57.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -149.2% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -177.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -81.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -88.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -79.8% | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -83.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -95.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -105.3% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | -139.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -166.2% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.3% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -81.2% | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -69.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -72.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -84.2% | -61.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -92.6% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.75 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.86 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.60 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.62 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.52 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.50 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.59 | $-3.84 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.60 | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $675.0M | $5.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $771.9M | $20.5M |
| Total Assets | $961.3M | $91.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $675.0M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $711.9M | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $742.7M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $724.3M | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.4M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $762.5M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $750.4M | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $723.3M | $11.5M |
| Q4 25 | $771.9M | $20.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $798.8M | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $838.3M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $860.2M | $21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $859.0M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $874.9M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $873.4M | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $898.0M | $20.0M |
| Q4 25 | $961.3M | $91.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $968.7M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $95.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $100.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $101.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $108.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $109.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $113.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-46.5M | $737.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-46.9M | $-686.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -62.4% | -1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-93.2M | $-4.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-46.5M | $737.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-33.5M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.0M | $-818.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-38.7M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.3M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-39.1M | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-46.9M | $-686.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-34.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.4M | $-923.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.5M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.8M | $926.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-45.1M | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | -62.4% | -1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -48.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.7% | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -41.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.2% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -57.6% | -13.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -20.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AI
| License And Service | $70.2M | 93% |
| Professional Services | $4.9M | 7% |
HHS
| Fulfillment And Logistics Services | $17.3M | 43% |
| Customer Care | $13.7M | 34% |
| Other | $8.9M | 22% |
