vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of C3.ai, Inc. (AI) and NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP (NRP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
C3.ai, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($75.1M vs $51.3M, roughly 1.5× NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP). NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP runs the higher net margin — 78.5% vs -139.3%, a 217.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, C3.ai, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-20.3% vs -21.8%). Over the past eight quarters, C3.ai, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.1% CAGR vs -8.3%).
C3.ai, Inc. is a leading enterprise artificial intelligence software provider that develops and delivers scalable AI applications, platform tools, and industry-specific solutions for clients across sectors including manufacturing, energy, financial services, healthcare and public sector. Its offerings help organizations optimize operations, reduce costs, mitigate risks, and realize data-driven decision making.
Natural Resource Partners LP is a U.S.-headquartered master limited partnership that owns, manages and leases mineral reserve interests. Its asset portfolio covers coal, aggregates, industrial minerals and oil & gas, with operations primarily across North America, deriving most revenue from royalties paid by third-party resource extraction operators.
AI vs NRP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $75.1M | $51.3M |
| Net Profit | $-104.7M | $40.3M |
| Gross Margin | 40.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -149.2% | 83.7% |
| Net Margin | -139.3% | 78.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.3% | -21.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -58.7% | -28.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.75 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $75.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.8M | $51.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.3M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.2M | $50.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $86.6M | $54.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.4M | $65.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-104.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-116.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-79.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-80.2M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-66.0M | $42.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-62.8M | $38.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-72.9M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-72.6M | $56.2M |
| Q4 25 | 40.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 57.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -149.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -177.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -81.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -88.7% | 83.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -79.8% | 74.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -83.2% | 84.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -95.1% | 92.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -105.3% | 91.0% |
| Q4 25 | -139.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -166.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -81.2% | 78.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -69.9% | 69.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -72.0% | 76.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -84.2% | 84.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -92.6% | 85.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.75 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.86 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.60 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.62 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.52 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.50 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.59 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.60 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $675.0M | $30.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $138.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $771.9M | — |
| Total Assets | $961.3M | $772.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $675.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $711.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $742.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $724.3M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.4M | $30.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $762.5M | $30.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $750.4M | $32.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $723.3M | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $138.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $142.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $210.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $188.8M |
| Q4 25 | $771.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $798.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $838.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $860.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $859.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $874.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $873.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $898.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $961.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $968.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $772.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $772.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $772.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $789.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $772.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-46.5M | $34.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-46.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -62.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.86× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-93.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-46.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-33.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.0M | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-38.7M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.0M | $54.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.3M | $56.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-39.1M | $71.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-46.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-34.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-45.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | -62.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -48.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -22.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -41.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -57.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.8% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AI
| License And Service | $70.2M | 93% |
| Professional Services | $4.9M | 7% |
NRP
| Coal Royalty Revenues | $35.5M | 69% |
| Soda Ash Segment | $4.6M | 9% |
| Transportation And Processing Services | $4.4M | 9% |
| Production Lease Minimum Revenues | $2.7M | 5% |
| Oil And Gas Royalty Revenues | $2.4M | 5% |
| Other | $1.6M | 3% |
