vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Senmiao Technology Ltd (AIHS) and AutoZone (AZO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AutoZone is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.3B vs $358.7K, roughly 11916.1× Senmiao Technology Ltd). AutoZone runs the higher net margin — 11.0% vs -289.2%, a 300.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AutoZone posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs -60.9%).
Senmiao Technology Ltd is a China-based automotive service provider that operates online used car trading platforms, offers auto financing referral services, and matches after-sales support for individual consumers and small auto dealers across domestic regional markets. Its core segments include transaction facilitation, financing consulting, and other value-added services for the domestic automotive circulation sector.
AutoZone, Inc., doing business as AutoZone, is an American retailer of aftermarket automotive parts and accessories, the largest in the United States. Founded in 1979, AutoZone has 7,140 stores across the United States, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Brazil, and the US Virgin Islands. The company is based in Memphis, Tennessee.
AIHS vs AZO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $358.7K | $4.3B |
| Net Profit | $-1.0M | $468.9M |
| Gross Margin | 13.8% | 52.5% |
| Operating Margin | -305.7% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | -289.2% | 11.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -60.9% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.5% | -3.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.29 | $27.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $358.7K | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.5K | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $836.0K | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $809.6K | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $917.0K | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $742.3K | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $873.8K | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $468.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $530.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-648.7K | $837.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-164.4K | $608.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $487.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-565.3K | $564.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-711.4K | $902.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-673.4K | $651.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 52.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.8% | 51.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.2% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.7% | 53.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.6% | 53.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | 52.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.0% | 53.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -305.7% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -83.6% | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.1% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -255.3% | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -44.8% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -83.0% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.6% | 21.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -289.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -71.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.7% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -219.3% | 12.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -61.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -95.8% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -77.1% | 15.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $27.63 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.29 | $31.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.43 | $48.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | $35.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.51 | $28.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.54 | $32.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.68 | $51.42 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.64 | $36.69 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.5M | $285.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $397.3K | $-2.9B |
| Total Assets | $5.7M | $20.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $287.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $677.0K | $271.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $867.8K | $268.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $701.3K | $300.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $949.2K | $304.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $792.0K | $298.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $748.9K | $275.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $397.3K | $-3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $-3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | $-4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.9M | $-4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $-4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-459.2K | $-4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.2K | $-4.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $19.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $19.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $18.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8M | $18.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $17.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $17.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2M | $17.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-865.6K | $373.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $35.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.80× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $373.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-865.6K | $944.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-71.4K | $952.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-321.2K | $769.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.1K | $583.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $356.1K | $811.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.6K | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8K | $669.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $630.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $511.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $423.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.3K | $291.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $355.3K | $564.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.6K | $723.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6K | $434.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.8% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 10.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
