vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Senmiao Technology Ltd (AIHS) and HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC (HTZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $358.7K, roughly 5654.0× Senmiao Technology Ltd). HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC runs the higher net margin — -9.6% vs -289.2%, a 279.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.6% vs -60.9%).
Senmiao Technology Ltd is a China-based automotive service provider that operates online used car trading platforms, offers auto financing referral services, and matches after-sales support for individual consumers and small auto dealers across domestic regional markets. Its core segments include transaction facilitation, financing consulting, and other value-added services for the domestic automotive circulation sector.
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc., known as Hertz, is an American car rental company based in Estero, Florida. The company operates its namesake Hertz brand, along with the brands Dollar Rent A Car, Firefly Car Rental, and Thrifty Car Rental.
AIHS vs HTZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $358.7K | $2.0B |
| Net Profit | $-1.0M | $-194.0M |
| Gross Margin | 13.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -305.7% | -11.0% |
| Net Margin | -289.2% | -9.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -60.9% | -0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.5% | 59.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.29 | $-0.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $358.7K | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.5K | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $836.0K | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $809.6K | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $917.0K | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $742.3K | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $873.8K | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.5K | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $-194.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-648.7K | $184.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-164.4K | $-294.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-443.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-565.3K | $-479.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-711.4K | $-1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-673.4K | $-865.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | $-186.0M |
| Q4 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 176.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -305.7% | -11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -83.6% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.1% | -14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -255.3% | -29.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -44.8% | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -83.0% | -62.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.6% | -20.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2115.7% | -27.9% |
| Q4 25 | -289.2% | -9.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -71.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.7% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -219.3% | -24.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -61.7% | -23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -95.8% | -51.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -77.1% | -36.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1932.0% | -8.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.29 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.43 | $0.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.51 | $-1.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.54 | $-1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.68 | $-4.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.64 | $-2.82 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.61 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.5M | $565.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $397.3K | $-459.0M |
| Total Assets | $5.7M | $22.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $565.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $677.0K | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $867.8K | $503.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $701.3K | $626.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $949.2K | $592.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $792.0K | $501.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $748.9K | $568.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $737.7K | $465.0M |
| Q4 25 | $397.3K | $-459.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $-317.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | $-504.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.9M | $-262.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $153.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-459.2K | $681.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.2K | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $894.9K | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $22.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $23.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $23.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8M | $22.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $21.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $23.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2M | $25.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $24.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-865.6K | $193.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-865.6K | $193.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-71.4K | $835.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-321.2K | $346.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.1K | $251.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $356.1K | $414.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.6K | $894.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8K | $546.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-247.5K | $370.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.3K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $355.3K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.6K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-275.8K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 385.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -39.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
