vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Senmiao Technology Ltd (AIHS) and Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nakamoto Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($444.9K vs $358.7K, roughly 1.2× Senmiao Technology Ltd). Nakamoto Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8374.2% vs -289.2%, a 8663.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Nakamoto Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-26.3% vs -60.9%).
Senmiao Technology Ltd is a China-based automotive service provider that operates online used car trading platforms, offers auto financing referral services, and matches after-sales support for individual consumers and small auto dealers across domestic regional markets. Its core segments include transaction facilitation, financing consulting, and other value-added services for the domestic automotive circulation sector.
AIHS vs NAKA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $358.7K | $444.9K |
| Net Profit | $-1.0M | $37.3M |
| Gross Margin | 13.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | -305.7% | -41198.2% |
| Net Margin | -289.2% | 8374.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -60.9% | -26.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.5% | 3820.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.29 | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $358.7K | $444.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.5K | $388.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $836.0K | $408.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $809.6K | $579.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | $917.0K | $603.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | $742.3K | $647.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | $873.8K | $639.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.5K | $829.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $37.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-648.7K | $-86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-164.4K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-565.3K | $-1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-711.4K | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-673.4K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | $-282.3K |
| Q4 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 176.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -305.7% | -41198.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -83.6% | -2680.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.1% | -585.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -255.3% | -179.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -44.8% | -169.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -83.0% | -162.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.6% | -162.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2115.7% | -28.6% |
| Q4 25 | -289.2% | 8374.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -71.6% | -22162.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.7% | -590.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -219.3% | -179.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -61.7% | -165.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -95.8% | -156.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -77.1% | -206.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1932.0% | -34.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.29 | $0.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.43 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.51 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.54 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.68 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.64 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.5M | $22.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $397.3K | $514.3M |
| Total Assets | $5.7M | $730.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $22.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $677.0K | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $867.8K | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $701.3K | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $949.2K | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $792.0K | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $748.9K | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $737.7K | $287.4K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $148.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $205.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $254.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $710.0K |
| Q4 25 | $397.3K | $514.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $477.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.9M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-459.2K | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.2K | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $894.9K | $-383.1K |
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $730.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $692.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8M | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $799.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-865.6K | $-23.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.63× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-865.6K | $-23.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-71.4K | $-13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-321.2K | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.1K | $-865.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $356.1K | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.6K | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8K | $-913.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-247.5K | $-213.4K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.3K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $355.3K | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.6K | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-275.8K | $-224.6K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.8% | -511.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.7% | -161.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 385.8% | -27.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -39.6% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
