vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Senmiao Technology Ltd (AIHS) and Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Senmiao Technology Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($358.7K vs $290.0K, roughly 1.2× Sintx Technologies, Inc.). Senmiao Technology Ltd runs the higher net margin — -289.2% vs -763.8%, a 474.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sintx Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-46.5% vs -60.9%).
Senmiao Technology Ltd is a China-based automotive service provider that operates online used car trading platforms, offers auto financing referral services, and matches after-sales support for individual consumers and small auto dealers across domestic regional markets. Its core segments include transaction facilitation, financing consulting, and other value-added services for the domestic automotive circulation sector.
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is an advanced materials company specializing in R&D and manufacturing of high-performance silicon nitride and other technical ceramic products. It serves key segments including medical implants, aerospace & defense, industrial wear components, and electric vehicle applications, with core markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
AIHS vs SINT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $358.7K | $290.0K |
| Net Profit | $-1.0M | $-2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 13.8% | 64.8% |
| Operating Margin | -305.7% | -799.3% |
| Net Margin | -289.2% | -763.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -60.9% | -46.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -83.5% | -30.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.29 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $358.7K | $290.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $906.5K | $208.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $836.0K | $151.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $809.6K | $369.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $917.0K | $542.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $742.3K | $799.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $873.8K | $859.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.5K | $687.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-648.7K | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-164.4K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-565.3K | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-711.4K | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-673.4K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.4M | $-886.0K |
| Q4 25 | 13.8% | 64.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.2% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.7% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.6% | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | 73.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.0% | 73.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 176.1% | 67.5% |
| Q4 25 | -305.7% | -799.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -83.6% | -1613.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -73.1% | -1764.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -255.3% | -645.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -44.8% | -319.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -83.0% | -802.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.6% | -315.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2115.7% | -465.4% |
| Q4 25 | -289.2% | -763.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -71.6% | -1701.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.7% | -1535.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -219.3% | -621.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -61.7% | -312.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -95.8% | -780.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -77.1% | -256.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1932.0% | -129.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.29 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.43 | $-3.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.51 | $-1.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.54 | $17.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.68 | $-6.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.64 | $-3.61 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-21.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.5M | $4.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $397.3K | $2.9M |
| Total Assets | $5.7M | $9.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.5M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $677.0K | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $867.8K | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $701.3K | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $949.2K | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $792.0K | $4.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $748.9K | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $737.7K | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | $397.3K | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.9M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.2M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-459.2K | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.2K | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $894.9K | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2M | $15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $17.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-865.6K | $-2.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-2.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -822.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 14.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-865.6K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-71.4K | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-321.2K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.1K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $356.1K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.6K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.8K | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-247.5K | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.3K | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $355.3K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.6K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.6K | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-275.8K | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -822.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1250.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | -368.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.8% | -234.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.7% | -323.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | -299.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 385.8% | -423.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.1% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -39.6% | 25.3% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
