vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Sintx Technologies, Inc. (SINT) and Catheter Precision, Inc. (VTAK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($290.0K vs $238.0K, roughly 1.2× Catheter Precision, Inc.). Sintx Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -763.8% vs -2427.7%, a 1663.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Catheter Precision, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (59.7% vs -46.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Catheter Precision, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (70.4% CAGR vs -35.0%).
Sintx Technologies, Inc. is an advanced materials company specializing in R&D and manufacturing of high-performance silicon nitride and other technical ceramic products. It serves key segments including medical implants, aerospace & defense, industrial wear components, and electric vehicle applications, with core markets across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
Namiki Precision Jewel Co., Ltd. is a Japanese component manufacturing company based in Tokyo, Japan. The company was founded in 1939 as a manufacturer of synthetic sapphire jewel bearings for electrical measuring instruments. Namiki supplies industrial jewel parts, dc coreless and dc brushless motors, multi-functional vibration components, precision gearheads, medical equipment, watch exterior parts, Analog Record-related Products and other precision components. Namiki merged with its affil...
SINT vs VTAK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $290.0K | $238.0K |
| Net Profit | $-2.2M | $-5.8M |
| Gross Margin | 64.8% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | -799.3% | -4143.3% |
| Net Margin | -763.8% | -2427.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -46.5% | 59.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -30.7% | -2.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.50 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $290.0K | $238.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.0K | $226.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.0K | $212.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $369.0K | $143.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $542.0K | $149.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $799.0K | $96.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $859.0K | $93.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $687.0K | $82.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-2.2M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.3M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-886.0K | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | 64.8% | 91.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.7% | 92.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.7% | 93.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.3% | 92.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.6% | 92.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 73.7% | 89.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 73.9% | 82.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.5% | 93.9% |
| Q4 25 | -799.3% | -4143.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1613.0% | -1336.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1764.9% | -2210.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -645.8% | -2500.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -319.6% | -2047.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -802.0% | -2978.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -315.5% | -2921.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -465.4% | -3190.2% |
| Q4 25 | -763.8% | -2427.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1701.4% | -996.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1535.1% | -2409.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -621.1% | -2828.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -312.7% | -3777.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -780.9% | -4291.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -256.6% | -4537.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -129.0% | -3262.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.50 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.46 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.91 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.29 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.04 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.96 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.61 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.66 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.1M | $88.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.9M | $7.1M |
| Total Assets | $9.5M | $15.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.44× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.1M | $88.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3M | $838.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | $450.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.6M | $2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | $16.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.8M | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.9M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $11.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.8M | $14.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $18.5M |
| Q4 25 | $9.5M | $15.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $25.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $27.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.3M | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3M | $26.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $28.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.3M | $-1.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-2.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -822.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.5% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.3M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.5M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.6M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.4M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.9M | $-2.0M |
| Q4 25 | -822.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1250.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1070.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -368.6% | -1642.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -234.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -323.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -299.7% | -1873.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -423.1% | -2395.1% |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.8% | 48.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.3% | 26.8% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
