vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AIM ImmunoTech Inc. (AIM) and Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (ASTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AIM ImmunoTech Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.0K vs $15.6K, roughly 1.3× Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (67.1% CAGR vs -27.5%).
AIM ImmunoTech Inc., formerly known as Hemispherx Biopharma Inc., is a biopharmaceutical company based in Ocala, Florida that is focused on the research and development of therapeutics to treat multiple types of cancers, various viruses and immune-deficiency disorders. Founded in 1990, the company has twenty-three employees.
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded photovoltaic (PV) company located in Thornton, Colorado. Its primary product is a flexible CIGS solar cell on a plastic substrate.
AIM vs ASTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.0K | $15.6K |
| Net Profit | $-4.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -14057.1% | — |
| Net Margin | -19881.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -53.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.0% | -42.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-6.46 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $21.0K | $15.6K | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0K | $28.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.0K | $17.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.0K | $15.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.0K | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.0K | $8.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.0K | $27.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.0K | $5.6K |
| Q4 25 | $-4.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.3M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.8M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.7M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.0M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.7M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.8M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | -14057.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9411.5% | -6892.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10584.0% | -12316.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -22618.8% | -11177.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13011.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -12825.7% | -26443.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7388.0% | -8490.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14335.0% | -44206.0% |
| Q4 25 | -19881.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12630.8% | -7081.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11176.0% | -12177.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -23156.3% | -10716.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -13260.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -10571.4% | -19776.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3672.0% | -12420.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14542.5% | -45316.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-6.46 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.57 | $-0.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.68 | $-1.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $-1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.80 | $50.75 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.00 | $-1.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.00 | $-6.76 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.12 | $-53.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $2.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.5M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-9.8M | $3.3M |
| Total Assets | $5.8M | $6.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $835.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0M | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1M | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.9M | $187.5K |
| Q4 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.1M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.5M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $5.8M | $6.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $5.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.6M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.6M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.2M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.69× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.0M | $-6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-6.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -44350.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 204.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-12.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.0M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.1M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.4M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.8M | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-6.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -44350.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6182.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -10692.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9923.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 204.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 103.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
