vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (ASTI) and Nexxen International Ltd. (NEXN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.6K vs $89, roughly 176.5× Nexxen International Ltd.).
Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. is a publicly traded photovoltaic (PV) company located in Thornton, Colorado. Its primary product is a flexible CIGS solar cell on a plastic substrate.
Nexxen is a New York-based, publicly traded online advertising company. Founded in 2007, it focuses on digital advertising, including video, mobile, native advertising, and display technology and connected TV. Its stock trades on both the Nasdaq and London Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol NEXN. The company employs over 800 people across 19 offices globally.
ASTI vs NEXN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.6K | $89 |
| Net Profit | — | $-10 |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.2% |
| Net Margin | — | -11.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -42.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.6K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.5K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.6K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.6K | $89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.7K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.7M | $-10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6892.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -12316.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -11177.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -26443.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8490.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -44206.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7081.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -12177.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10716.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -19776.2% | -11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12420.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -45316.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.62 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.17 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.13 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.75 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.37 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.76 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-53.00 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $6.3M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $187.5K | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.9M | $58.7K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-6.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -44350.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 204.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-12.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $58.7K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -44350.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6182.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -10692.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -9923.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 204.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 103.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
