vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and American Homes 4 Rent (AMH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Homes 4 Rent is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($455.0M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.4× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). American Homes 4 Rent runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs 4.3%, a 27.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 4.2%). American Homes 4 Rent produced more free cash flow last quarter ($823.7M vs $51.4M). Over the past eight quarters, American Homes 4 Rent's revenue compounded faster (3.6% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
American Homes 4 RentAMHEarnings & Financial Report
American Homes 4 Rent, doing business as AMH, is a real estate investment trust based in Las Vegas, Nevada, that invests in single-family rental homes. As of December 31, 2019, the company owned 52,552 homes in 22 states. Its largest concentrations are in Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth, and Charlotte, North Carolina.
AIN vs AMH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $455.0M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $144.3M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 31.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | 0.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $455.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $478.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $457.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $459.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $436.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $445.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $423.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $423.6M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $144.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $116.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $123.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $128.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $143.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $87.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $108.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $128.1M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 27.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 33.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 25.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 30.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $108.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $7.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $13.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | 0.72× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $108.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $45.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $323.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $69.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $199.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $162.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $718.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $124.8M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | $4.5B |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $7.0B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $13.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $13.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $13.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $13.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $13.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $12.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | 0.64× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $864.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $823.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 181.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 8.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 5.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $1.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $864.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $223.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $271.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $223.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $811.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $233.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $274.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $201.8M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $823.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $214.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $257.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $215.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $777.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $225.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $263.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $191.0M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 181.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 56.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 47.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 178.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 50.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 62.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | 45.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 5.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 2.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 1.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 5.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 2.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 2.52× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 1.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
AMH
Segment breakdown not available.
